Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1033418
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorROCHA, A. dos S.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorDAHER, R. F.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorGRAVINA, G. de A.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorPEREIRA, A. V.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorRODRIGUES, E. V.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorVIANA, A. P.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorSILVA, V. Q. R. dapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorAMARAL JUNIOR, A. T. dopt_BR
dc.contributor.authorNOVO, A. A. C.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorOLIVEIRA, M. L. F.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorOLIVEIRA, E. da S.pt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-08T11:11:11Zpt_BR
dc.date.available2016-01-08T11:11:11Zpt_BR
dc.date.created2016-01-08pt_BR
dc.date.issued2015pt_BR
dc.identifier.citationAfrican Journal of Agricultural Research, v. 10, n. 47, p. 4283-4294, 2015.pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1033418pt_BR
dc.descriptionElephant grass is a plant of tropical origin with high biomass-production potential that stands out today as an alternative energy source. The potential of its genotypes depends on the genotype × environment interaction. The objective of this study was to estimate the genotype × environment interaction and compare stability methods in elephant grass for biomass production in a biannual cutting regime. The experiment was conducted in a randomized block design with two replicates and evaluations of 73 elephant-grass genotypes in six cuts. The trait dry matter yield was utilized for the analysis of the genotype × environment interaction and the stability. The stability analysis methods employed were those of Yates and Cochran, Plaisted and Peterson, Wricke, Annicchiarico, Lin and Binns, and Huehn. Kang and Phan?s ranking was adopted for all the methods. Spearman?s coefficient was utilized to evaluate the degree of agreement between the different methods employed. Significant differences were observed for the genotype × environment interaction. Non-parametric Lin and Binns? and Annicchiarico?s methods were more discriminating than the analysis of variance methods in the evaluation of stability and productivity of the tested genotypes.pt_BR
dc.language.isoporpt_BR
dc.rightsopenAccesspt_BR
dc.subjectEnergy alternativept_BR
dc.subjectGenotype by environment interactionpt_BR
dc.titleComparison of stability methods in elephant-grass genotypes for energy purposes.pt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de periódicopt_BR
dc.date.updated2016-01-08T11:11:11Zpt_BR
dc.subject.thesagroPennisetum Purpureumpt_BR
dc.subject.nalthesaurusbiomass productionpt_BR
riaa.ainfo.id1033418pt_BR
riaa.ainfo.lastupdate2016-01-08pt_BR
dc.contributor.institutionAvelino dos Santos Rocha; Rogério Figueiredo Daher; Geraldo de Amaral Gravina; ANTONIO VANDER PEREIRA, CNPGL; Erina Vitório Rodrigues; Alexandre Pio Viana; VANESSA QUITETE RIBEIRO DA SILVA, CPAMT; Antônio Texeira do Amaral Junior; Antônio Alonso Cecon Novo; Maria Lorraine Fonseca Oliveira; Erik da Silva Oliveira.pt_BR
Aparece nas coleções:Artigo em periódico indexado (CNPGL)

Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo Descrição TamanhoFormato 
Cnpgl2015AfrJAgrResComparison.pdf861,42 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
Visualizar/Abrir
Mostrar registro simples do item Visualizar estatísticas

FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInGoogle BookmarksMySpace