Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1073885
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorPANTOJA, W. M. F.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorNEVES, L.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorDIAS, M. R.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorMARINHO, R. G. B.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorMONTAGNER, D.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorTAVARES-DIAS, M.pt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2017-08-10T11:11:11Zpt_BR
dc.date.available2017-08-10T11:11:11Zpt_BR
dc.date.created2017-08-10pt_BR
dc.date.issued2012pt_BR
dc.identifier.citationRevista MVZ Córdoba, v. 17, n. 1, p. 2812-2819, 2012.pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1073885pt_BR
dc.descriptionThis study describes the parasitic fauna and relative condition factor (Kn) in Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus L. (Cichlidae) from fish farms in the State of Amapá. Material and methods. 123 fish from four fish farms in the state of Amapá, Brazil were necropsied for parasitological and Kn analysis. Results. 64.2% of the examined fish, had the gills infected with Cichlidogyrus tilapiae Paperna, 1960 (Monogenoidea: Dactylogyridae); Ichthyophthirius multifiliis Fouquet, 1876 (Protozoa: Ciliophora), Trichodina Ehrenberg, 1830 and Paratrichodina africana Kazubski & El-Tantawy, 1986 (Protozoa: Trichodinidae). The highest prevalence found corresponded to Monogenoidea C. tilapiae while the lowest corresponded to Trichodinidae. However, I. multifiliis was the parasite that presented the greatest intensity and abundance. The differences found in the infection rates of the different fish farms due to causes further discussed. The parasitism did not influence the relative condition factor (Kn) of fish. This was the first record of P. africana in Brazil and occurred in the Eastern Amazon. Conclusions. In Brazil, Lamproglena sp. is an emerging parasite in the Southern and Southeastern regions, but this crustacean was not found in the Nile tilapia in the State of Amapá. The parasitic infections in Nile tilapia farmed in Brazil are caused by protozoan, monogenoidea, crustacea and digenea species, and the regional differences on their prevalence and intensity rates are discussed in this study.pt_BR
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.rightsopenAccesseng
dc.subjectParasito animalpt_BR
dc.subjectAnimal parasitept_BR
dc.subjectFreshwater fishept_BR
dc.titleProtozoan and metazoan parasites of Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus cultured in Brazil.pt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de periódicopt_BR
dc.date.updated2017-08-10T11:11:11Zpt_BR
dc.subject.thesagroPeixe de água docept_BR
riaa.ainfo.id1073885pt_BR
riaa.ainfo.lastupdate2017-08-10pt_BR
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.21897/rmvz.248eng
dc.contributor.institutionWANDERSON MICHEL FARIAS PANTOJA, Estagiário CPAF-APpt_BR
dc.contributor.institutionLIGIA NEVES, Estagiária CPAF-APeng
dc.contributor.institutionMÁRCIA KELLY REIS DIAS, Unifapeng
dc.contributor.institutionRENATA DAS GRAÇAS BARBOSA MARINHO, Unifapeng
dc.contributor.institutionDANIEL MONTAGNER, CPAF-APeng
dc.contributor.institutionMARCOS TAVARES DIAS, CPAF-AP.eng
Aparece nas coleções:Artigo em periódico indexado (CPAF-AP)

Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo Descrição TamanhoFormato 
AP2012ProtozoanandmetazoanparasiteTilapia.pdf714,95 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
Visualizar/Abrir
Mostrar registro simples do item Visualizar estatísticas

FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInGoogle BookmarksMySpace