Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1118388
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorALMEIDA, R. G. dept_BR
dc.contributor.authorALMEIDA, E, M.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorGOMES, R. da C.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorALVES, F. V.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorLAURA, V. A.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorMACEDO, M. C. M.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorCOSTA, G. F.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorMASTELARO, A. P.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorBUNGENSTAB, D. J.pt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-09T00:39:46Z-
dc.date.available2020-01-09T00:39:46Z-
dc.date.created2020-01-08
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationIn: CONGRESO INTERNACIONAL DE SISTEMAS SILVOPASTORILES 10., 2019, Asunción. Por una produción sostenible: Libro de Actas. Asunción: CIPAV, 2019.pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1118388-
dc.descriptionAdoption of silvopastoral systems (SS) in Brazil has been stimulated in the last decade. This work aimed to evaluate beef production under SS with eucalyptus using densities of 178 and 441 trees per ha and to compare it to a traditional monoculture Piatã grass pasture (PM) in the Brazilian Cerrado. Shading caused by the two tree densities, in the third year of the systems implementation did not cause changes neither on forage mass nor on its nutritive value. As consequence, results show that both SS did not differ from the PM for beef cattle production in the period studied, allowing better thermal comfort for grazing cattle, besides wood production and greenhouse gases mitigation.pt_BR
dc.language.isoporpt_BR
dc.rightsopenAccesspt_BR
dc.subjectSistema silvipastorilpt_BR
dc.titleCattle production in silvopastoral systems compared to monoculture pasture in the Brazilian Cerrado.pt_BR
dc.typeArtigo em anais e proceedingspt_BR
dc.date.updated2020-01-15T11:11:11Z
dc.subject.thesagroGadopt_BR
dc.subject.thesagroMonoculturapt_BR
dc.subject.thesagroPastagempt_BR
dc.subject.nalthesaurusForage grassespt_BR
dc.format.extent2p. 150-158pt_BR
riaa.ainfo.id1118388pt_BR
riaa.ainfo.lastupdate2020-01-15 -02:00:00
dc.contributor.institutionROBERTO GIOLO DE ALMEIDA, CNPGC; Emizael Menezes Almeida, Universidade Federal do Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, MS; RODRIGO DA COSTA GOMES, CNPGC; FABIANA VILLA ALVES, CNPGC; VALDEMIR ANTONIO LAURA, CNPGC; MANUEL CLAUDIO MOTTA MACEDO, CNPGC; Genilson F. Costa, Universidade Estadual do Mato Grosso do Sul; Ariadne Pegoraro Mastelaro, Universidade Federal do Paraná; DAVI JOSE BUNGENSTAB, CNPGC.pt_BR
Aparece nas coleções:Artigo em anais de congresso (CNPGC)

Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo Descrição TamanhoFormato 
Cattleproduction.pdf566,56 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
Visualizar/Abrir
Mostrar registro simples do item Visualizar estatísticas

FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInGoogle BookmarksMySpace