Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1120075
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorROCHA, R. N. C. daeng
dc.contributor.authorRODRIGUES, M. do R. L.eng
dc.contributor.authorLOPES, R.eng
dc.contributor.authorCYSNE, A. Q.eng
dc.contributor.authorMACEDO, J. L. V. deeng
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-10T18:11:00Z-
dc.date.available2020-02-10T18:11:00Z-
dc.date.created2020-02-10
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationNativa, Sinop, v. 8, n. 1, p. 52-57, jan./fev. 2020.eng
dc.identifier.issn2318-7670eng
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1120075-
dc.descriptionThe objective of this study was to analyze the technical viability and cash flow of intercrop cultivation in the first three years after oil palm planting in a degraded area of the Amazon. Four intercropping systems were tested: SI - oil palm + banana; SII - oil palm + cassava; SIII - oil palm + pineapple, and SIV - oil palm in monoculture. Intercropping was performed during the first three years of oil palm planting and the cash flow of the systems evaluated during this period. The oil palm bunches production was evaluated from 7th to 10th year after planting. SIII had best financial performance, with deployment and maintenance costs 100% amortized over the three years of the system. The SI and SII systems amortized 86.7% and 64.5% of the costs, respectively. Oil palm bunches production was not affected by intercropping. Yield of intercrops was similar to that expected from the crops in monoculture. The intercropping systems evaluated provide a technically and economically viable alternative to generate income and amortize planting and maintenance costs during oil palm juvenile phase in degraded areas of the Amazon.eng
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.rightsopenAccesseng
dc.titleProduction and cash flow of oil palm intercropping systems an amazonian degraded area.eng
dc.typeArtigo de periódicoeng
dc.date.updated2020-04-24T11:11:11Z
dc.subject.thesagroElaeis Guineensiseng
dc.subject.thesagroProdução Integradaeng
dc.subject.thesagroDendêeng
dc.subject.thesagroCusto de Produçãoeng
dc.subject.nalthesaurusIntegrated crop managementeng
dc.subject.nalthesaurusProduction costseng
dc.subject.nalthesaurusOil palm productseng
riaa.ainfo.id1120075eng
riaa.ainfo.lastupdate2020-04-24 -03:00:00
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.31413/nativa.v8i1.8073eng
dc.contributor.institutionRAIMUNDO NONATO CARVALHO DA ROCHA, CNPASA; MARIA DO ROSARIO LOBATO RODRIGUES, CPAA; RICARDO LOPES, CPAA; ALEX QUEIROZ CYSNE, CPAA; JEFERSON LUIS VASCONCELOS DE MACEDO, CPAA.eng
Aparece nas coleções:Artigo em periódico indexado (CNPASA)

Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo Descrição TamanhoFormato 
CNPASA2020nativa.pdf398,7 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
Visualizar/Abrir
Mostrar registro simples do item Visualizar estatísticas

FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInGoogle BookmarksMySpace