Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1005632
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorPEDROSO, A. de F.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorPEDROSO, A. M.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorBARIONI JUNIOR, W.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorSOUZA, G. B. dept_BR
dc.date.accessioned2015-01-15T11:11:11Zpt_BR
dc.date.available2015-01-15T11:11:11Zpt_BR
dc.date.created2015-01-15pt_BR
dc.date.issued2014pt_BR
dc.identifier.citationRevista Brasileira de Zootecnia , v. 43, n. 4, p. 169-174, apr. 2014.pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn1806-9290pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1005632pt_BR
dc.descriptionThe objective was to evaluate the effects of laboratory-silo type and method of silage extract production, respectively, on sugarcane silage fermentation and recovery of fermentation products. Sugarcane was mechanically harvested and ensiled in three different types of laboratory silos (five replicates): 9.7 × 30 cm PVC tubes with tight lids, equipped or unequipped with Bunsen valves, and 20 L plastic buckets with tight lids and Bunsen valves. Three methods were used to produce silage extracts for pH, ethanol, acetic and lactic acids determination: extraction of silage juice by a hydraulic press and production of water extracts using a stomacher or a blender. Total dry matter loss (231 g/kg DM) was not affected by silo type. No interactions between silo type and method of silage extract production were observed for ethanol and organic acids contents in the silages. Interaction between silo type and method of silage extract preparation was detected for pH. Silo type affected ethanol content but did not affect lactic and acetic acids concentration in the silages. Dry matter, crude protein, neutral detergent fiber and ash were not affected by silo type. The method used to produce silage extracts affected the recovery of all fermentation products analyzed in the silages. Recovery of ethanol and acetic acid was higher when silage extracts were produced using a blender. For lactic acid recovery, the hydraulic press method was superior to the other two methods. Silage fermentation pattern is not affected by silo type, but the method used to produce silage extracts and some characteristics of silos affect the recovery of volatile fermentation products.pt_BR
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.rightsopenAccesseng
dc.subjectEthanolcpt_BR
dc.subjectLaboratory silopt_BR
dc.subjectSilage extractpt_BR
dc.subjectSugarcane silagept_BR
dc.titleEvaluation of sugarcane laboratory ensiling and analysis techniques.pt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de periódicopt_BR
dc.date.updated2016-02-26T11:11:11Zpt_BR
dc.subject.nalthesaurusacetic acidpt_BR
dc.subject.nalthesauruslactic acidpt_BR
riaa.ainfo.id1005632pt_BR
riaa.ainfo.lastupdate2016-02-26pt_BR
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982014000400002eng
dc.contributor.institutionANDRE DE FARIA PEDROSO, CPPSE; ALEXANDRE MENDONCA PEDROSO, CPPSE; WALDOMIRO BARIONI JUNIOR, CPPSE; GILBERTO BATISTA DE SOUZA, CPPSE.pt_BR
Aparece nas coleções:Artigo em periódico indexado (CPPSE)

Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo Descrição TamanhoFormato 
PROCI2014.00220.pdf256,88 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
Visualizar/Abrir
Mostrar registro simples do item Visualizar estatísticas

FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInGoogle BookmarksMySpace