Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1019181
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DCValorLengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorTAVARES-DIAS, M.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorDIAS-JÚNIOR, M. B. F.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorFLORENTINO, A. C.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorSILVA, L. M. A.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorCUNHA, A. C. dapt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2015-07-02T11:11:11Zpt_BR
dc.date.available2015-07-02T11:11:11Zpt_BR
dc.date.created2015-07-02pt_BR
dc.date.issued2015pt_BR
dc.identifier.citationRevista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária, Jaboticabal, v. 24, n. 2, p. 136-147, abr-jun. 2015.pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn1984-2961pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1019181pt_BR
dc.descriptionThe purpose of this study was to use the informations relating to parasite crustaceans species that was published over the course of one century (1913 to 2013), in order to search for infestation and distribution patterns among these ectoparasites in Brazilian freshwater fish species. This search was carried out on 445 samples of 119 host fish of 27 families within the orders Characiformes, Perciformes, Clupeiformes, Mugiliformes, Osteoglossiformes, Symbranchiformes, Tetraodontiformes and Siluriformes from various regions of Brazil. We organized different host-parasite systems into matrices grouping species at different taxonomic and infestation levels and according to host parameters. Five families of parasites (Ergasilidae, Argulidae, Lernaeidae, Lernaeopodidae and Cymothoidae) distributed into 76 species of 27 genera were analyzed in the host samples, which presented dominance of Ergasilidae species, mainly from the genus Ergasilus. Some crustaceans are host and site-specific, especially in relation to fish in particular habitats and lifestyles (e.g. Perulernaea gamitanae, Anphira branchialisand Riggia paranensis), while other parasites frequently have no preference (e.g. Lernaea cyprinaceaand Braga patagonica). We found broadly similar distribution patterns for some crustacean species among the different localities, whereas other species showed well-defined geographical patterns, and these findings were discussed.pt_BR
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.rightsopenAccesseng
dc.subjectBranchiurapt_BR
dc.subjectHostpt_BR
dc.subjectAnimal parasitept_BR
dc.subjectAmazonpt_BR
dc.subjectParasito animalpt_BR
dc.titleDistribution pattern of crustacean ectoparasites of freshwater fish from Brazil.pt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de periódicopt_BR
dc.date.updated2019-05-29T11:11:11Zpt_BR
dc.subject.thesagroCopepodapt_BR
dc.subject.thesagroHospedeiropt_BR
dc.subject.nalthesaurusIsopodapt_BR
riaa.ainfo.id1019181pt_BR
riaa.ainfo.lastupdate2019-05-29 -03:00:00pt_BR
dc.contributor.institutionMARCOS TAVARES-DIAS, CPAF-AP; MIGUEL BENEDITO FERREIRA DIAS-JÚNIOR, UNIFAP, Macapá, AP; ALEXANDRO CEZAR FLORENTINO, UNIFAP, Macapá, AP; LUIS MAURÍCIO ABDON SILVA, IEPA, Macapá, AP; ALAN CAVALCANTI DA CUNHA, Laboratório de Química, Saneamento e Modelagem de Sistemas Ambientais - UNIFAP, Macapá, AP.pt_BR
Aparece en las colecciones:Artigo em periódico indexado (CPAF-AP)

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción TamañoFormato 
CPAFAP2015Distributionpattern.pdf3.29 MBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInGoogle BookmarksMySpace