Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1028099
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorNIEMEYER, J. C.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorMOREIRA-SANTOS, M.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorRIBEIRO, R.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorRUTGERS, M.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorNOGUEIRA, M. A.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorSILVA, E. M. dapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorSOUSA, J. P.pt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-06T11:11:11Zpt_BR
dc.date.available2015-11-06T11:11:11Zpt_BR
dc.date.created2015-11-06pt_BR
dc.date.issued2015pt_BR
dc.identifier.citationPlos One, v. 10, n. 11, p. 1-25, Nov. 2015.pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1028099pt_BR
dc.descriptionThis study presents data on the detailed evaluation (tier 2) of a site-specific ecological risk assessment (ssERA) in a former smelter area contaminated with metals (Santo Amaro, Bahia, Brazil). Combining information from three lines of evidence (LoE), chemical (Chem-LoE), ecotoxicological (EcotoxLoE) and ecological (EcoLoE), in the Triad approach, integrated risk values were calculated to rank sites and confirm the potential risk disclosed with tier 1. Risk values were calculated for the habitat and for the retention functions in each sampling point. Habitat function included the ChemLoE calculated from total metal concentrations. The EcotoxLoE was based on reproduction tests with terrestrial invertebrates (Folsomia candida, Enchytraeus crypticus, Eisenia andrei), shoot length and plant biomass (Avena sativa, Brassica rapa). For the EcoLoE, ecological parameters (microbial parameters, soil invertebrate community, litter breakdown) were used to derive risk values. Retention function included the ChemLoE, calculated from extractable metal concentrations, and the EcotoxLoE based on eluate tests with aquatic organisms (Daphnia magna reproduction and Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata growth). Results related to the habitat function indicated that the metal residues are sufficient to cause risk to biota, while the low metal levels in extracts and the general lack of toxicity in aquatic tests indicated a high soil retention capacity in most sampling points. Integrated risk of tier 2 showed the same trend of tier 1, suggesting the need to proceed with remediation actions. The high risk levels were related to direct toxicity to organisms and indirect effects, such as failure in the establishment of vegetation and the consequent loss of habitat quality for microorganisms and soil fauna. This study shed some light on the selection of tools for the tier 2 of an ssERA in tropical metal-contaminated sites, focusing on ecological receptors at risk and using available chemical methods, ecological surveys and ecotoxicity tests.pt_BR
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.rightsopenAccesseng
dc.titleEcological risk assessment of a metal-contaminated area in the tropics. Tier II: detailed assessment.pt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de periódicopt_BR
dc.date.updated2017-06-20T11:11:11Zpt_BR
dc.subject.thesagroToxidezpt_BR
dc.subject.thesagroContaminaçãopt_BR
dc.subject.thesagroMetalpt_BR
dc.subject.nalthesaurusEnvironmental assessmentpt_BR
riaa.ainfo.id1028099pt_BR
riaa.ainfo.lastupdate2017-06-20pt_BR
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0141772pt_BR
dc.contributor.institutionJÚLIA CARINA NIEMEYER, UFSC; MATILDE MOREIRA SANTOS, University of Coimbra; RUI RIBEIRO, University of Coimbra; MICHIEL RUTGERS, RIVM - The Netherlands; MARCO ANTONIO NOGUEIRA, CNPSO; EDUARDO MENDES DA SILVA, UFBA; JOSÉ PAULO SOUSA, University of Coimbra.pt_BR
Aparece nas coleções:Artigo em periódico indexado (CNPSO)

Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo Descrição TamanhoFormato 
2015PLOSONENiemeyeretal.pdf488.65 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
Visualizar/Abrir

FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInGoogle BookmarksMySpace