Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1032619
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DCValorLengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorMERCADANTE, M. E. Z.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorCALIMAN, A. P. de M.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorCANESIN, R. C.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorBONILHA, S. F. M.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorBERNDT, A.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorFRIGHETTO, R. T. S.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorMAGNANI, E.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorBRANCO, R. H.pt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-29T11:11:11Zpt_BR
dc.date.available2015-12-29T11:11:11Zpt_BR
dc.date.created2015-12-29pt_BR
dc.date.issued2015pt_BR
dc.identifier.citationRevista Brasileira de Zootecnia, Viçosa, v. 44, n. 7, p. 255-262, jul. 2015.pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1032619pt_BR
dc.descriptionResidual feed intake (RFI) is an attractive measure of feed efficiency, as it does not depend on body size, growth rate, or body composition measures (Durunna et al., 2012). High-efficiency animals exhibit low RFI and consume less feed than expected for maintenance and production, whereas low-efficiency animals have high RFI and observed feed intake higher than the predicted feed intake. The possibility of improving production efficiency by exploiting the genetic variation in RFI and possible variation in traits related to emission of greenhouse gases is of great economic importance for beef cattle production. Studies have shown that selection of animals for low RFI (high feed efficiency) reduces methane emissions in cattle (Nkrumah et al., 2006; Hegarty et al., 2007; Fitzsimons et al., 2013). However, there are inconsistencies in relation to differences in feed intake and corresponding methane emissions between low- and high-RFI animals. Fitzsimons et al. (2013) offered grass silage to heifers and observed that both DMI and methane emission (g/d) were lower for low-RFI compared with high-RFI animals, and Jones et al. (2011) reported that DMI was similar between divergent RFI groups and that methane emission was similar when animals grazed low-quality pastures but were lower for low- RFI compared with high-RFI animals when grazing highquality pastures. The conflicting observations regarding the variation in methane emission of high- and low-efficiency animals between studies suggest that selection of cattle for increasing feed efficiency does not necessarily result in a reduction in methane emission (Freetly and Brown- Brandl, 2013). To date, published studies relating RFI and methane emission are limited to Bos taurus cattle, and little information is available on Bos indicus cattle. In view of these considerations, the objective of the present study was to evaluate the relationship between enteric methane emission and residual feed intake in Nellore cattle fed a high-roughage diet.pt_BR
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.rightsopenAccesseng
dc.subjectEnteric methane productionpt_BR
dc.subjectFeed efficiencypt_BR
dc.titleRelationship between residual feed intake and enteric methane emission in Nellore cattle.pt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de periódicopt_BR
dc.date.updated2016-03-01T11:11:11Zpt_BR
dc.subject.thesagroGado de cortept_BR
dc.subject.thesagroMetanopt_BR
dc.subject.thesagroNutrição animalpt_BR
dc.subject.thesagroBrachiaria brizanthapt_BR
dc.subject.thesagroPerformancept_BR
dc.subject.nalthesaurusBeef cattlept_BR
dc.subject.nalthesaurusMethanept_BR
dc.subject.nalthesaurussulfur hexafluoridept_BR
riaa.ainfo.id1032619pt_BR
riaa.ainfo.lastupdate2016-03-01pt_BR
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-92902015000700004eng
dc.contributor.institutionMARIA EUGÊNIA ZERLOTTI MERCADANTE, IZ Sertãozinho; ANA PAULA DE MELO CALIMAN, IZ Sertãozinho; ROBERTA CARRILHO CANESIN, IZ Sertãozinho; SARAH FIGUEIREDO MARTINS BONILHA, IZ Sertãozinho; ALEXANDRE BERNDT, CPPSE; ROSA TOYOKO SHIRAISHI FRIGHETTO, CNPMA; ELAINE MAGNANI, IZ Sertãozinho; RENATA HELENA BRANCO, IZ Sertãozinho.pt_BR
Aparece en las colecciones:Artigo em periódico indexado (CPPSE)

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción TamañoFormato 
PROCI2015.00123.pdf622.58 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir

FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInGoogle BookmarksMySpace