Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1051668
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorOTTONI FILHO, T. B.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorLEAL, I. F.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorMACEDO, J. R. dept_BR
dc.contributor.authorREIS, B. C. B.pt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-25T11:11:11Zpt_BR
dc.date.available2016-08-25T11:11:11Zpt_BR
dc.date.created2016-08-25pt_BR
dc.date.issued2016pt_BR
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Agricultural Science, v. 8, n. 8, p. 158-170, 2016.pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1051668pt_BR
dc.descriptionDespite the large applicability of the field capacity (FC) concept in hydrology and engineering, it presents various ambiguities and inconsistencies due to a lack of methodological procedure standardization. Experimental field and laboratory protocols taken from the literature were used in this study to determine the value of FC for different depths in 29 soil profiles, totaling 209 soil samples. The volumetric water content (θ) values were also determined at three suction values (6 kPa, 10 kPa, 33 kPa), along with bulk density (BD), texture (T) and organic matter content (OM). The protocols were devised based on the water processes involved in the FC concept aiming at minimizing hydraulic inconsistencies and procedural difficulty while maintaining the practical meaning of the concept. A high correlation between FC and θ(6 kPa) allowed the development of a pedotransfer function (Equation 3) quadratic for θ(6 kPa), resulting in an accurate and nearly bias-free calculation of FC for the four database geographic areas, with a global root mean squared residue (RMSR) of 0.026 m3·m-3. At the individual soil profile scale, the maximum RMSR was only 0.040 m3·m-3. The BD, T and OM data were generally of a low predicting quality regarding FC when not accompanied by the moisture variables. As all the FC values were obtained by the same experimental protocol and as the predicting quality of Equation 3 was clearly better than that of the classical method, which considers FC equal to θ(6), θ(10) or θ(33), we recommend using Equation 3 rather than the classical method, as well as the protocol presented here, to determine in-situ FC.pt_BR
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.rightsopenAccesseng
dc.subjectCapacidade de campopt_BR
dc.subjectDrenagem internapt_BR
dc.subjectFunções de pedotransferênciapt_BR
dc.titleAn algebraic pedotransfer function to calculate standardized in situ determined field capacity.pt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de periódicopt_BR
dc.date.updated2016-08-25T11:11:11Zpt_BR
riaa.ainfo.id1051668pt_BR
riaa.ainfo.lastupdate2020-09-02 -03:00:00pt_BR
dc.identifier.doi10.5539/jas.v8n8p158pt_BR
dc.contributor.institutionTHEOPHILO B. OTTONI FILHO, UFRJ; ISAIAS F. LEAL, UFRJ; JOSE RONALDO DE MACEDO, CNPS; BRUNO C. B. REIS, UFRJ.pt_BR
Aparece nas coleções:Artigo em periódico indexado (CNPS)

Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo Descrição TamanhoFormato 
2016026.pdf357,61 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
Visualizar/Abrir

FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInGoogle BookmarksMySpace