Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1058046
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorLANES, E. C. M. dept_BR
dc.contributor.authorLOPES, F. C. F.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorCAMPOS, N. R.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorOLIVEIRA, J. S. ept_BR
dc.contributor.authorMORENZ, M. J. F.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorFRISCHE-NETO, R.pt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2016-12-06T11:11:11Zpt_BR
dc.date.available2016-12-06T11:11:11Zpt_BR
dc.date.created2016-12-06pt_BR
dc.date.issued2016pt_BR
dc.identifier.citationComunicata Scientiae, v. 7, n. 1, p. 30-37, 2016.pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1058046pt_BR
dc.descriptionDifferent methods are available to determine fiber content in feeds. However, information about the accuracy of this methods for neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and acid detergent fiber ADF contents estimation (obtained with the use of TNT-100 nylon filtering bags) is very limited related to the large number of ruminant feed analysis. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of the automated and conventional Van Soest methods to determine NDF and ADF contents for bovine cattle and feed supplements. Four classes of samples (tropical forage, maize silage hybrid, concentrated supplements and bovine cattlecattle) were evaluated for NDF and ADF contents using conventional and automated methods. Analysis involved a hierarchical factorial scheme with an entirely randomized design executed with repetitions. It was concluded that the automated method procedure generated similar results when compared to the conventional method for the determination of NDF contents in tropical forage, bovine cattle and maize silage samples, although is not recommended for samples with a high starch content. This system was not efficient for ADF determination in the evaluated samples.pt_BR
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.rightsopenAccesseng
dc.subjectMaize silagept_BR
dc.subjectFiber analysispt_BR
dc.titleComparative efficacy of the conventional and automated methods for determining neutral and acid detergent fiber.pt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de periódicopt_BR
dc.date.updated2017-02-22T11:11:11Zpt_BR
dc.subject.nalthesaurusforagept_BR
riaa.ainfo.id1058046pt_BR
riaa.ainfo.lastupdate2017-02-22pt_BR
dc.identifier.doihttp://doi.org/10.14295/CS.v7i1.432eng
dc.contributor.institutionÉder Cristian Malta de Lanes, UFV; FERNANDO CESAR FERRAZ LOPES, CNPGL; Núbia Ribeiro Campos; JACKSON SILVA E OLIVEIRA, CNPGL; MIRTON JOSE FROTA MORENZ, CNPGL; Roberto Frische-Neto, UFV.pt_BR
Aparece nas coleções:Artigo em periódico indexado (CNPGL)

Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo Descrição TamanhoFormato 
Cnpgl2016ComunicataSciComparative.pdf378,36 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
Visualizar/Abrir
Mostrar registro simples do item Visualizar estatísticas

FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInGoogle BookmarksMySpace