Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1067451
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorGARRETT, R. D.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorNILES, M.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorGIL, J.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorDY, P.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorREIS, J. C. dospt_BR
dc.contributor.authorVALENTIM, J. F.pt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-22T11:11:11Zpt_BR
dc.date.available2017-03-22T11:11:11Zpt_BR
dc.date.created2017-03-22pt_BR
dc.date.issued2017pt_BR
dc.identifier.citationSustainability, Switzerland, v. 9, n. 3, p. 473-494, Mar. 2017.pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn2071-1050pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1067451pt_BR
dc.descriptionThe reintegration of crop and livestock systems within the same land area has the potential to improve soil quality and reduce water and air pollution, while maintaining high yields and reducing risk. In this study, we characterize the degree to which federal policies in three major global food production regions that span a range of socioeconomic contexts, Brazil, New Zealand, and the United States, incentivize or disincentivize the use of integrated crop and livestock practices (ICLS). Our analysis indicates that Brazil and New Zealand have the most favorable policy environment for ICLS, while the United States provides the least favorable environment. The balance of policy incentives and disincentives across our three cases studies mirrors current patterns of ICLS usage. Brazil and New Zealand have both undergone a trend toward mixed crop livestock systems in recent years, while the United States has transitioned rapidly toward continuous crop and livestock production. If transitions to ICLS are desired, particularly in the United States, it will be necessary to change agricultural, trade, environmental, biofuels, and food safety policies that currently buffer farmers from risk, provide too few incentives for pollution reduction, and restrict the presence of animals in crop areas. It will also be necessary to invest more in research and development in all countries to identify the most profitable ICLS technologies in each region.pt_BR
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.rightsopenAccesseng
dc.subjectAgroecologiapt_BR
dc.subjectIntegração lavoura-pecuária (iLP)pt_BR
dc.subjectIntegrated Crop and Livestock Systems (ICLS)pt_BR
dc.subjectEstados Unidospt_BR
dc.subjectNova Zelândiapt_BR
dc.subjectBrasilpt_BR
dc.subjectAgricultura sustentablept_BR
dc.subjectPolítica públicapt_BR
dc.titlePolicies for reintegrating crop and livestock systems: a comparative analysis.pt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de periódicopt_BR
dc.date.updated2017-03-28T11:11:11Zpt_BR
dc.subject.thesagroAgricultura sustentávelpt_BR
dc.subject.thesagroEcologia vegetalpt_BR
dc.subject.thesagroPolíticas públicaspt_BR
dc.subject.nalthesaurusSustainable agriculturept_BR
dc.subject.nalthesaurusAgroecologypt_BR
dc.subject.nalthesaurusPublic policypt_BR
dc.subject.nalthesaurusBrazilpt_BR
dc.subject.nalthesaurusUnited Statespt_BR
dc.subject.nalthesaurusNew Zealandpt_BR
riaa.ainfo.id1067451pt_BR
riaa.ainfo.lastupdate2017-03-28pt_BR
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/su9030473pt_BR
dc.contributor.institutionRachael D. Garrett, Boston University; Meredith Niles, University of Vermont; Juliana Gil, Boston University / Wageningen University; Philip Dy, Harvard University; JULIO CESAR DOS REIS, CPAMT; JUDSON FERREIRA VALENTIM, CPAF-Acre.pt_BR
Aparece nas coleções:Artigo em periódico indexado (CPAF-AC)

Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo Descrição TamanhoFormato 
26289.pdf617,65 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
Visualizar/Abrir
Mostrar registro simples do item Visualizar estatísticas

FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInGoogle BookmarksMySpace