Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Research center of Embrapa/Collection:||Embrapa Rondônia - Artigo em periódico indexado (ALICE)|
|Type of Material:||Artigo em periódico indexado (ALICE)|
|Authors:||RAMOS JUNIOR, E. U.|
BROGIN, R. L.
GODINHO, V. de P. C.
BOTELHO, F. J. E.
TARDIN, F. D.
TEODORO, P. D.
|Additional Information:||RODRIGO LUIS BROGIN, CNPSO; VICENTE DE PAULO CAMPOS GODINHO, CPAF-Rondonia; FLAVIO DESSAUNE TARDIN, CNPMS.|
|Title:||Identification of soybean genotypes with higt stability for the Brazilian macro - region 402 via biplot analysis.|
|Publisher:||Genetics and Molecular Research, v. 16, n. 3, gmr16039786, 2017.|
|Description:||Biplot analysis has often been used to recommend genotypes from different crops in the presence of the genotype x environment interaction (GxE). The objective of this study was to verify the association between the AMMI and GGE biplot methods and to select soybean genotypes that simultaneously meet high grain yield and stability to the environments belonging to the Edaphoclimatic Region 402, from Soybean Cultivation Region 4 (Mid-West), which comprises the Center North and West of Mato Grosso, and the southern region of Rondônia. Grain yield of 12 soybean genotypes was evaluated in seven competition trials of soybean cultivars in the 2014/2015 harvest. Significant GxE interaction revealed the need to use methods for recommending genotypes with adaptability and yield stability. The methods were complementary regarding the recommendation of the best genotypes. The AMMI analysis recommended MG/BR46 (Conquista) (G10) widely for all environments evaluated, whereas the BRY23-55012 (G9) and BRAS11-0149 (G2) were the most indicated genotypes by the GGE biplot method. However, the methods were concordant as to Porto Velho (PV1) environment that contributed least to the GxE interaction.|
|Appears in Collections:||Artigo em periódico indexado (CPAF-RO)|
Files in This Item:
|identificationofsoybeangenotypeswithhighstabilityforthebrazilianmacroregion402viabiplotanalysis.pdf||473,69 kB||Adobe PDF|