Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1085743
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorPEREIRA, L. A.
dc.contributor.authorABREU, A. F. B.
dc.contributor.authorVIEIRA JÚNIOR, I. C.
dc.contributor.authorPIRES, L. P. M.
dc.contributor.authorRAMALHO, M. A. P.
dc.date.accessioned2018-01-18T22:17:01Z-
dc.date.available2018-01-18T22:17:01Z-
dc.date.created2018-01-18
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationGenetics and Molecular Research, v. 16, n. 1, gmr16019494, Mar. 2017.
dc.identifier.issn1676-5680
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1085743-
dc.descriptionCommon bean producers in Brazil tend to grow plants as upright as possible. Because the control of this trait involves a large number of genes, recurrent selection (RS) is the best approach for successful plant improvement. Because plant architecture (PA) is evaluated using scores and usually has high heritability, RS for PA is performed through visual selection in generation S0. The aim of the present study was to evaluate selection progress and investigate whether this progress varies with the number of selected progenies or the generation evaluated. In addition, the effect of RS for the upright (PA) trait on progeny grain yield (GY) was investigated. Data of progenies S0:3 and S0:4 of the fifth, eighth, and twelfth cycles were used. A combined analysis of variance was performed using the adjusted means of the 47 best progenies from each generation and cycle, using two control cultivars as reference. A joint analysis of the two generations used during the evaluation of progenies for the different cycles was also performed. The genetic progress (GP) was estimated by fitting a linear regression equation to the relationship between the adjusted mean of each cycle and the number of cycles. We found that RS was efficient and the estimated GP of the evaluated progenies was 4.5%. Based on the GY heritability estimates, in more advanced generation selection for GY can be successfully performed on progenies. Thus, the selection already done for PA in F2 could be associated to the most productive progenies.
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.rightsopenAccesseng
dc.subjectSelection progress
dc.subjectUpright plants
dc.titleGenetic progress estimation strategy for upright common bean plants using recurrent selection.
dc.typeArtigo de periódico
dc.date.updated2018-01-18T22:17:01Zpt_BR
dc.subject.thesagroFeijão
dc.subject.thesagroPhaseolus vulgaris
dc.subject.thesagroMelhoramento genético vegetal
dc.subject.thesagroSeleção recorrente
dc.subject.nalthesaurusBeans
dc.subject.nalthesaurusPlant breeding
dc.subject.nalthesaurusRecurrent selection
dc.subject.nalthesaurusGrain yield
riaa.ainfo.id1085743
riaa.ainfo.lastupdate2018-01-18
dc.identifier.doi10.4238/gmr16019494
dc.contributor.institutionL. A. PEREIRA, UFLA; ANGELA DE FATIMA BARBOSA ABREU, CNPAF; I. C. VIEIRA JÚNIOR, UFLA; L. P. M. PIRES, UFLA; MAGNO ANTONIO PATTO RAMALHO, UFLA.
Aparece nas coleções:Artigo em periódico indexado (CNPAF)

Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo Descrição TamanhoFormato 
CNPAF2017gmrabreu.pdf273.33 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
Visualizar/Abrir

FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInGoogle BookmarksMySpace