Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1086414
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorSILVA, R. de O.
dc.contributor.authorBARIONI, L. G.
dc.contributor.authorHALL, J. A. J
dc.contributor.authorMORETTI, A. C.
dc.contributor.authorVELOSO, R. F.
dc.contributor.authorALEXANDER, P.
dc.contributor.authorCRESPOLINI, M.
dc.contributor.authorMORAN, D.
dc.date.accessioned2018-01-26T23:46:14Z-
dc.date.available2018-01-26T23:46:14Z-
dc.date.created2018-01-26
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationAgricultural Systems, v. 153, p. 201-211, 2017.
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1086414-
dc.descriptionGrassland degradation compromises the profitability of Brazilian livestock production, and pasture recovery is a promising strategy for sustainable intensification of agriculture (SAI). Recovery increases carbon sequestration into the soil and can potentially avoid deforestation; thereby reducing emissions intensity (EI), but only at increased investment cost per unit of area. We develop a multi-period linear programming (LP) model for grazing beef production planning to represent a typical Cerrado stocking and finishing beef farm. We compare economic and environmental performance of two alternative optimized pasture management approaches relative to the traditional practice (TRP), which is based on restoring pasture after a full degradation cycle of 8 years. The scenarios considered the difference made by access to subsidized credit through the Low Carbon Agriculture program (?Programa ABC?). The model estimates EI using upstream life cycle assessment (LCA), and dynamically estimates soil organic carbon (SOC) changes as a function of pasture management. The results show net present values (NPV) ranging from − 67 Brazilian reals per hectare-year (R$·ha− 1·yr− 1) to around 300 R$·ha− 1·yr− 1, respectively for traditional and optimized pasture management strategies. Estimated EI of the TRP is 9.26 kg CO2 equivalent per kg of carcass weight equivalent (kg CO2e/kg CWE) relative to 3.59 kg CO2e/kg CWE for optimized management. Highest emission abatement results from improved SOC sequestration, while access to credit could further reduce EI by around 20%. We consider the effects of alternative credit interest on both NPV and EI. The results provide evidence to inform the design of Brazil's key domestic policy incentive for low carbon agriculture, which is an important component of the country's Intended Nationally Determined Contributions (INDC) on emissions mitigation. The results also contribute to the global debate on the interpretation of SAI.
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.rightsopenAccesseng
dc.subjectGrassland Management
dc.titleSustainable intensification of Brazilian livestock production through optimized pasture restoration.
dc.typeArtigo de periódico
dc.date.updated2018-01-26T23:46:14Zpt_BR
dc.subject.thesagroPastagem
dc.subject.thesagroAgricultura sustentável
dc.subject.thesagroSolo
dc.subject.thesagroProgramação linear
dc.subject.nalthesaurusSustainable agriculture
dc.subject.nalthesaurusLinear programming
dc.subject.nalthesaurusSoil organic carbon
dc.subject.nalthesaurussustainable agricultural intensificationpt_BR
riaa.ainfo.id1086414
riaa.ainfo.lastupdate2018-01-26
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2017.02.001
dc.contributor.institutionRAFAEL DE OLIVEIRA SILVA, SRUC; LUIS GUSTAVO BARIONI, CNPTIA; J. A. JULIAN HAL, University of Edinburgh; ANTONIO CARLOS MORETTI, Unicamp; RUI FONSECA VELOSO, CPAC; PETER ALEXANDER, SRUC; MARIANE CRESPOLINI, Unicamp; DOMINIC MORAN, University of York.
Aparece nas coleções:Artigo em periódico indexado (CNPTIA)

Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo Descrição TamanhoFormato 
APSustainableSilvaBarionietal.pdf965,15 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
Visualizar/Abrir
Mostrar registro simples do item Visualizar estatísticas

FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInGoogle BookmarksMySpace