Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1095105
Título: Different progestagens sources do not affect the follicular population and the morphological quality of oocytes during ovarian stimulation in Santa Inês ewes.
Autoria: BRAGANÇA, G. M.
SOUZA-FABJAN, J. M. G.
BATISTA, R. I. T. P.
RIBEIRO, L. S.
BRAIR, V. L.
CÔRTES, L. R.
SOUZA, C. V.
TRAIRA, A. R.
FONSECA, J. F. da
MENCHACA, A.
BRANDÃO, F. Z.
Afiliação: Jeferson Ferreira da Fonseca, CNPC.
Ano de publicação: 2018
Referência: Animal Reprodroduction, v. 15, n. 3, p. 451, Jul./Sept. 2018. Abstracts A151. Edição dos Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Meeting of the Brazilian Embryo Technology Society (SBTE); Florianópolis, SC, Brazil, August 16th to 18th, 2018.
Conteúdo: In attempt to develop a hormonal protocol more suitable to produce good quality oocytes for use in biotechnologies, an earlier study demonstrated that FSH applied in multiple decreasing doses produced better quality oocytes. However, different progestagens implants used during ovarian stimulation have not yet been tested. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of different progestagens during ovarian stimulation on follicular population and oocyte morphological quality in Santa Inês ewes. In conclusion, the source of progestagens used during the ovarian stimulation protocol does not affect the follicular population, nor the oocyte quality. Exogenous progestagens may not be necessary when postsynchronization ovulation is confirmed by ultrasonography.
NAL Thesaurus: Animal reproduction
Sheep
Ewes
Oocytes
Tipo do material: Resumo em anais e proceedings
Acesso: openAccess
Aparece nas coleções:Resumo em anais de congresso (CNPC)

Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo Descrição TamanhoFormato 
cnpc2018Different.pdf101,11 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
Visualizar/Abrir

FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInGoogle BookmarksMySpace