Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Research center of Embrapa/Collection:||Embrapa Caprinos e Ovinos - Resumo em anais de congresso (ALICE)|
|Type of Material:||Resumo em anais de congresso (ALICE)|
|Authors:||BRAGANÇA, G. M.|
SOUZA-FABJAN, J. M. G.
BATISTA, R. I. T. P.
RIBEIRO, L. S.
BRAIR, V. L.
CÔRTES, L. R.
SOUZA, C. V.
TRAIRA, A. R.
FONSECA, J. F. da
BRANDÃO, F. Z.
|Additional Information:||Jeferson Ferreira da Fonseca, CNPC.|
|Title:||Different progestagens sources do not affect the follicular population and the morphological quality of oocytes during ovarian stimulation in Santa Inês ewes.|
|Publisher:||Animal Reprodroduction, v. 15, n. 3, p. 451, Jul./Sept. 2018. Abstracts A151. Edição dos Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Meeting of the Brazilian Embryo Technology Society (SBTE); Florianópolis, SC, Brazil, August 16th to 18th, 2018.|
|Description:||In attempt to develop a hormonal protocol more suitable to produce good quality oocytes for use in biotechnologies, an earlier study demonstrated that FSH applied in multiple decreasing doses produced better quality oocytes. However, different progestagens implants used during ovarian stimulation have not yet been tested. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of different progestagens during ovarian stimulation on follicular population and oocyte morphological quality in Santa Inês ewes. In conclusion, the source of progestagens used during the ovarian stimulation protocol does not affect the follicular population, nor the oocyte quality. Exogenous progestagens may not be necessary when postsynchronization ovulation is confirmed by ultrasonography.|
|NAL Thesaurus:||Animal reproduction|
|Appears in Collections:||Resumo em anais de congresso (CNPC)|