Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1095114
Title: Comparison of stress and animal welfare caused by the procedures of embryo collection by either surgical or non-surgical via in sheep.
Authors: SANTOS, J. D. R.
OLIVEIRA, I. C.
BRAIR, V. L.
BALARO, M. F. A.
MORAIS, M. C. C.
ARASHIRO, E. K. N.
SOUZA-FABJAN, J. M. G.
FONSECA, J. F. da
BRANDÃO, F. Z.
Affiliation: Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF) - Niteroi, RJ, Brasil; Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF) - Niteroi, RJ, Brasil; Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF) - Niteroi, RJ, Brasil; Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF) - Niteroi, RJ, Brasil; Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF) - Niteroi, RJ, Brasil; Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF) - Niteroi, RJ, Brasil; Jeferson Ferreira da Fonseca, CNPC.
Date Issued: 2018
Citation: Animal Reprodroduction, v. 15, n. 3, p. 404, Jul./Sept. 2018. Abstract A091. Edição dos Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Meeting of the Brazilian Embryo Technology Society (SBTE); Florianópolis, SC, Brazil, August 16th to 18th, 2018.
Description: In ovine species, embryo collection is commonly done by laparotomy (LP). However, this technique promotes adhesions in the reproductive organs leading to fertility impairment and affecting animal welfare. The non-surgical method, done by transcervical route (TC), although less invasive and expensive, can also affect animal welfare due to the cervix mechanical manipulation. In this perspective, biochemical markers of inflammation, as acute phase proteins, are considered reliable parameters of the systemic response to inflammatory processes.
Thesagro: Ovino
Reprodução Animal
Transferência de Embrião
NAL Thesaurus: Sheep
Ewes
Animal reproduction
Embryo transfer
Genetic markers
Keywords: Semen collection
Embryo collection
Biochemical markers
Coleta transcervical
Transcervical collection
Language: en
Type of Material: Resumo em anais e proceedings
Access: openAccess
Appears in Collections:Resumo em anais de congresso (CNPC)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
CNPC2018Comparison.pdf106,73 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open

FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInGoogle BookmarksMySpace