Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1103247
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DCValorLengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorSILVA, M. G. da
dc.contributor.authorPACKER, A. P.
dc.contributor.authorSAMPAIO, F. G.
dc.contributor.authorSILVA, C. M. da
dc.contributor.authorSILVA, J. L. da
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-11T00:04:38Z-
dc.date.available2019-01-11T00:04:38Z-
dc.date.created2019-01-08
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationIn: LATIN AMERICA AND CARIBBEAN ECOSYSTEM SERVICES PARTNERSHIP CONFERENCE, 2., 2018, Campinas. Book of abstracts... Campinas: Ecosystem Services Partnership (ESP), 2018.
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1103247-
dc.descriptionThe knowledge of the environmental impact of an activity can be seen as a market differential. Agricultural activities such as cattle raising have been heavily taxed because they are considered high greenhouse gases (GHG) emissions, forcing the market to adopt mitigating measures. Little is known about its emission and its real impact of aquaculture on climate change. The increase of GHG in the atmosphere results in alterations like the increase of the temperature and changes in the precipitation with direct effects in the aquaculture as alterations in the growth, reproduction and fish mortality. A pioneer work was done to quantify methane (CH4) and carbon dioxide (CO2) fluxes of fish farming areas with Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) in net cages. The GHG fluxes were measured in fish farms at the tropical reservoirs Furnas (FHR), Castanhão (CAS) and Chavantes (CHV). The CH4 was classified by the mechanism for gas transport through the water column as diffusive flux or bubble flux. The comparison between the points with fish net cages and control (without net cages) in FHR and CHV suggest that fish farming did not impact the emission of CH4 by diffusive transport. In the CAS, high CH4 diffusive fluxes were observed in sites with fish net cages. The mean CH4 bubble flux in CAS and CHV was higher in areas with fish net cages when compared to areas free of fish production suggesting the influence of fish farming on the CH4 bubble fluxes. In the FHR, the decrease in depth during the drought period was associated as the factor with the greatest impact on the CH4 bubbles emission. The CO2 sink in CAS and emission in CHV suggest that characteristics of the reservoir, as chlorophyll-a and turbidity have a greater impact factor to CO2 emission than the fish farming.
dc.language.isoporpt_BR
dc.rightsopenAccesspt_BR
dc.subjectTropical reservoirs
dc.titleClimate change and fish farming.
dc.typeResumo em anais e proceedings
dc.date.updated2019-10-30T11:11:11Zpt_BR
dc.subject.nalthesaurusGreenhouse gas emissions
dc.subject.nalthesaurusFish farms
dc.subject.nalthesaurusClimate change
dc.subject.nalthesaurusWater reservoirs
riaa.ainfo.id1103247
riaa.ainfo.lastupdate2019-10-30 -03:00:00
dc.contributor.institutionMarcelo G. da Silva; ANA PAULA CONTADOR PACKER, CNPMA; FERNANDA GARCIA SAMPAIO, CNPMA; Consuelo Marques da Silva; Juliana Lopes da Silva.
Aparece en las colecciones:Resumo em anais de congresso (CNPMA)

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción TamañoFormato 
RAPackerAPCetalLAC2018.pdf92.53 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir

FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInGoogle BookmarksMySpace