Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1109185
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCASARI, R. A. C. N.eng
dc.contributor.authorPAIVA, D. S.eng
dc.contributor.authorSILVA, V. N. B.eng
dc.contributor.authorFERREIRA, T. M. M.eng
dc.contributor.authorSOUZA JUNIOR, M. T.eng
dc.contributor.authorOLIVEIRA, N. G.eng
dc.contributor.authorKOBAYASHI, A. K.eng
dc.contributor.authorMOLINARI, H. B. C.eng
dc.contributor.authorSANTOS, T. T.eng
dc.contributor.authorGOMIDE, R. L.eng
dc.contributor.authorMAGALHÃES, P. C.eng
dc.contributor.authorSOUSA, C. A. F. deeng
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-22T01:11:47Z-
dc.date.available2019-05-22T01:11:47Z-
dc.date.created2019-05-21
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Molecular Sciences, v. 20, n. 9, 2273, May-1, 2019.eng
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1109185-
dc.descriptionThe feasibility of thermography as a technique for plant screening aiming at drought-tolerance has been proven by its relationship with gas exchange, biomass, and yield. In this study, unlike most of the previous, thermography was applied for phenotyping contrasting maize genotypes whose classification for drought tolerance had already been established in the field. Our objective was to determine whether thermography-based classification would discriminate the maize genotypes in a similar way as the field selection in which just grain yield was taken into account as a criterion. We evaluated gas exchange, daily water consumption, leaf relative water content, aboveground biomass, and grain yield. Indeed, the screening of maize genotypes based on canopy temperature showed similar results to traditional methods. Nevertheless, canopy temperature only partially reflected gas exchange rates and daily water consumption in plants under drought. Part of the explanation may lie in the changes that drought had caused in plant leaves and canopy structure, altering absorption and dissipation of energy, photosynthesis, transpiration, and partitioning rates. Accordingly, although there was a negative relationship between grain yield and plant canopy temperature, it does not necessarily mean that plants whose canopies were maintained cooler under drought achieved the highest yield.eng
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.rightsopenAccesseng
dc.subjectFenotipagem de plantaseng
dc.subjectDéficit hídricoeng
dc.titleUsing thermography to confirm genotypic variation for drought response in maize.eng
dc.typeArtigo de periódicoeng
dc.date.updated2019-10-17T11:11:11Z
dc.subject.thesagroZea Mayseng
dc.subject.nalthesaurusAbiotic stresseng
riaa.ainfo.id1109185eng
riaa.ainfo.lastupdate2019-10-17 -03:00:00
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/ijms20092273eng
dc.contributor.institutionRAPHAEL A. C. N. CASARI, CNPAE; DAYANE S. PAIVA, CNPAE; VIVIANNY N. B. SILVA; THALITA M. M. FERREIRA; MANOEL TEIXEIRA SOUZA JUNIOR, CNPAE; NELSON G. OLIVEIRA, CNPAE; ADILSON KENJI KOBAYASHI, CNPAE; HUGO BRUNO CORREA MOLINARI, CNPAE; THIAGO TEIXEIRA SANTOS, CNPTIA; REINALDO LUCIO GOMIDE, CNPMS; PAULO C. MAGALHÃES; CARLOS ANTONIO FERREIRA DE SOUSA, CPAMN.eng
Appears in Collections:Artigo em periódico indexado (CPAMN)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Artigotermografia.pdf6,17 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open

FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInGoogle BookmarksMySpace