Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1115560
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DCValorLengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorRIBEIRO, I. A.eng
dc.contributor.authorVOLTOLINI, T. V.eng
dc.contributor.authorSIMOES, W. L.eng
dc.contributor.authorFERREIRA, M. A. J. F.eng
dc.contributor.authorMENEZES, D. R.eng
dc.contributor.authorGOIS, G. C.eng
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-29T18:12:31Z-
dc.date.available2019-11-29T18:12:31Z-
dc.date.created2019-11-29
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationBiological Rhythm Research, v. 50, nov. 2019.eng
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1115560-
dc.descriptionThis study aimed to evaluate morphological, bromatological, in vitro gas production and yield of forage watermelon (Citrullus lanatus var. citroides) genotypes in semi-arid condition. Seven genotypes were evaluated were BGCIA 228, BGCIA 239, Jojoba, BGCIA 228 x BGCIA239, BGCIA 228 x BGCIA Jojoba, BGCIA 239 x Jojoba and BGCIA 991. The experimental design was a complete randomized block with three replicates. The genotypes presented differences between the characteristics: fruit length (P = 0.01), vertical diameter (P = 0.02), peel thickness (P = 0.01), fruit pulp thickness (P = 0.02), transversal diameter (P = 0.02), in vitro dry matter digestibility (P = 0.003) and the latency time (P < 0.0001). Cumulative in vitro gas production and gas production rate was not affected by genotypes. None of the studied genotypes had production and productivity affected. Among them, Jojoba and BGCIA 991 stood out for having heavier and longer fruits, and a higher peel thickness and pulp length.eng
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.rightsopenAccesseng
dc.subjectMelancia forrageiraeng
dc.subjectSemiáridoeng
dc.titleMorphological responses, fruit yield, nutritive value and in vitro gas production of forage watermelon genotypes on semi-arid condition.eng
dc.typeArtigo de periódicoeng
dc.date.updated2019-12-05T11:11:11Z
dc.subject.thesagroPlanta Forrageiraeng
dc.subject.thesagroGenótipoeng
dc.subject.thesagroForragemeng
dc.subject.nalthesaurusCitrullus lanatus var. citroideseng
dc.subject.nalthesaurusForage grasseseng
riaa.ainfo.id1115560eng
riaa.ainfo.lastupdate2021-01-12 -02:00:00
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/09291016.2019.1629218eng
dc.contributor.institutionIsadora Almeida Ribeiro; TADEU VINHAS VOLTOLINI, CPATSA; WELSON LIMA SIMOES, CPATSA; MARIA ALDETE JUSTINIANO DA FONSECA, Cenargen; Daniel Ribeiro Menezes; Glayciane Costa Gois.eng
Aparece en las colecciones:Artigo em anais de congresso (CPATSA)

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción TamañoFormato 
Morphologicalresponsesfruityieldnutritivevalueandinvitrogasproductionofforage2019.pdf1.41 MBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInGoogle BookmarksMySpace