Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1117410
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorOLIVEIRA, T. R. A. deeng
dc.contributor.authorCARVALHO, H. W. L. deeng
dc.contributor.authorOLIVEIRA, G. H. F.eng
dc.contributor.authorCOSTA, E. F. N.eng
dc.contributor.authorGRAVINA, G. de A.eng
dc.contributor.authorSANTOS, R. D. doseng
dc.contributor.authorCARVALHO FILHO, J. L. S. deeng
dc.contributor.otherTâmara Rebecca Albuquerque de Oliveira; Hélio Wilson Lemos de Carvalho; Gustavo Hugo Ferreira Oliveira; Emiliano Fernandes Nassau Costa; Geraldo de Amaral Gravina; RAFAEL DANTAS DOS SANTOS, CPATSA; José Luiz Sandes de Carvalho Filho.eng
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-20T18:09:23Z-
dc.date.available2019-12-20T18:09:23Z-
dc.date.created2019-12-20
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.other58955
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1117410-
dc.descriptionThe cultivation of genotypes non-adapted to the cultivation region of interest is among the main factors responsible for low yield. The aim of the present study is to select hybrid maize through GGE biplot analysis and to assess its adaptability and stability in different environments in Northeastern Brazil. Twenty-five hybrid maize cultivars were assessed in ten different environments in Northeastern Brazil in 2012 and 2013 based on the randomized block design, with two replications. The analysis of variance and assessment of genotype adaptability and stability were made through GGE biplot analysis, based on grain yield. Analysis of variance results showed different performances depending on the genotype, as well as genotype/environment interaction. The biplot analysis was efficient on data interpretation and represented 63.73% of the total variation in the first two main components, it also allowed classifying the ten environments into three macro-environments. Most environments were positively correlated. Hybrids 2 B 604 HX, 30 A 95 HX, 2 B 587 HX and 2 B 710 HX were responsive and stable. Hybrid 30 A 16 HX was recommended for macro-environments2 and 3. Cultivar 30 A 68 HX was recommended to environment 1. São Raimundo das Mangabeiras and Nova Santa Rosa counties were discriminating and representative. Nossa Senhora das Dores, Umbaúba, Teresina, Brejo, Frei Paulo, Colinas and Balsa counties were ambiguous and non-recommended for further evaluations.eng
dc.description.uribitstream/item/207646/1/Hybrid-maize-selection-through-GGE-biplot-analysis-2019.pdf
dc.languageeneng
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherBragantia, v. 78, n. 2, p. 166-174, 2019.eng
dc.relation.ispartofEmbrapa Semiárido - Artigo em periódico indexado (ALICE)eng
dc.subjectMelhoramento de plantaseng
dc.subjectAnálise biplot GGEeng
dc.subjectAnalise multivariadaeng
dc.subjectSeleção híbridaeng
dc.titleHybrid maize selection through GGE biplot analysis.eng
dc.typeArtigo em periódico indexado (ALICE)eng
dc.date.updated2019-12-20T18:09:23Z
dc.subject.thesagroMilhoeng
dc.subject.thesagroMelhoramento Genético Vegetaleng
dc.subject.nalthesaurusPlant breedingeng
dc.ainfo.id1117410eng
dc.ainfo.lastupdate2019-12-20
dc.identifier.doi10.1590/1678-4499.20170438eng
Appears in Collections:Artigo em periódico indexado (CPATSA)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
HybridmaizeselectionthroughGGEbiplotanalysis2019.pdf2,13 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open

FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInGoogle BookmarksMySpace