Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1117787
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorMAGALHÃES, L. C.eng
dc.contributor.authorLOPES JÚNIOR, E. S.eng
dc.contributor.authorGUIMARÃES, A. de S. L.eng
dc.contributor.authorMIRANDA, M. de S.eng
dc.contributor.authorSOUZA, T. T. dos S.eng
dc.contributor.authorMONTE, A. P. O. deeng
dc.contributor.authorSILVA, A. A. de A.eng
dc.contributor.authorSAMPAIO, L. S.eng
dc.contributor.authorNASCIMENTO, T. V. C.eng
dc.contributor.authorSOUSA, P. H. F. deeng
dc.contributor.authorNOGUEIRA, D. M.eng
dc.contributor.authorCORDEIRO, M. F.eng
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-27T18:17:24Z-
dc.date.available2019-12-27T18:17:24Z-
dc.date.created2019-12-27
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Applied Animal Research, v. 47, n. 1, p. 560-564, 2019.eng
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1117787-
dc.descriptionThis study was carried out to compare Day 0 and traditional protocols for in vivo embryo production. Twenty-two crossbred ewes were used as embryo donors and assigned to two groups. Ewes from Traditional protocol were submitted to estrus synchronization with CIDR for 14 days and superovulation treatment was induced 60 h before the withdrawal of CIDR with 240 mg pFSH. Donors from Day 0 protocol were subjected to a short-term protocol of estrus synchronization (6 days) and superovulation treatment was the same to the other group, but it started 84 h after CIDR withdrawal. Embryo recoveries were performed using the transcervical method. All embryo donors (100%) presented estrus regardless of the hormone protocol used. The treatments did not affect the ovarian response, as well as quality and viability of embryos (P > 0.05). Treatments had a small dispersion of estrus, 81.81% (9/11) animals from the Traditional protocol group presented estrus 20 h after CIDR withdrawal and 90.9% (10/11) of the Day 0 protocol group presented estrus 24 h. Regarding embryo production, there was no significant difference between hormonal treatments for the different parameters evaluated (P > 0.05). It can be concluded that the Day 0 protocol was not different from the Traditional protocol in crossbred ewes.eng
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.rightsopenAccesseng
dc.subjectOvelha mestiçaeng
dc.subjectEmbriões in vivoeng
dc.subjectOvelhas do protocolo Tradicionaleng
dc.subjectProtocolo hormonaleng
dc.subjectTratamentos hormonaiseng
dc.titleComparison between Day 0 and traditional protocols for estrus synchronization and multiple ovulation in crossbred hair sheep.eng
dc.typeArtigo de periódicoeng
dc.date.updated2019-12-27T18:17:24Z
dc.subject.thesagroOvelhaeng
dc.subject.thesagroSuperovulaçãoeng
dc.subject.nalthesaurusSheepeng
riaa.ainfo.id1117787eng
riaa.ainfo.lastupdate2019-12-27
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/09712119.2019.1687307eng
dc.contributor.institutionLivia Correia Magalhães; Edilson Soares Lopes Júnior; Aionne de Souza Leite Guimarães; Mayara de Souza Miranda; Thais Thatiane dos Santos Souza; Alane Pains Oliveira do Monte; Ana Arlete de Amorim Silva; Ludmila Souza Sampaio; Thiago Vinicius Costa Nascimento; Pedro Humberto Felix de Sousa; DANIEL MAIA NOGUEIRA, CPATSA; Mabel Freitas Cordeiro.eng
Aparece nas coleções:Artigo em periódico indexado (CPATSA)

Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo Descrição TamanhoFormato 
ComparisonbetweenDay0andtraditionalprotocols2019.pdf1,02 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
Visualizar/Abrir
Mostrar registro simples do item Visualizar estatísticas

FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInGoogle BookmarksMySpace