Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1119647
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorPEDREIRA, B. C. eeng
dc.contributor.authorPARAISO, I.eng
dc.contributor.authorSILVA, D.eng
dc.contributor.authorCARVALHO, A. P.eng
dc.contributor.authorSOLLENBERGER, L. E.eng
dc.contributor.authorPEREIRA, D.eng
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-31T00:35:59Z-
dc.date.available2020-01-31T00:35:59Z-
dc.date.created2020-01-30
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationIn: ASA, CSSA & SSSA INTERNATIONAL ANNUAL MEETING, 2019, San Antonio. Embracing the digital environment: abstracts [eletrônico]... San Antonio: ASA; CSSA; SSSA, 2019.eng
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1119647-
dc.descriptionForage cultivar diversification reduces risk in forage-livestock systems. Ipyporã brachiariagrass (Brachiaria 'BRS RB331 Ipyporã') (B. ruziziensis × B. brizantha) was released in 2017 for use in areas where spittlebug [Deois flavopicta, Notozulia entreriana and Mahanarva spp.] is a challenge. Our objective was to compare forage production in Ipyporã and standard cultivar Mulato II (B. ruziziensis × B. brizantha × B. decumbens) under continuous stocking during May 2016 to May 2018 in the Amazon Biome (Sinop, MT, Brazil). The experimental design was a randomized complete block with four replicates (1.5-ha pastures). Average canopy height was maintained at 30 ± 5.0 cm.Mulato II presented greater herbage accumulation (HA; 17360 kg DM ha-1) and herbage accumulation rate (HAR; 55 kg ha-1day-1) than Ipyporã (14930 kg DM ha-1and 48 kg ha-1day-1, respectively) across the two years. Mulato II crude protein concentration was 10 g kg-1 greater than Ipyporã. Spittlebugs were present only during the rainy season, and foliar damage occurred only in Mulato II pastures. Both cultivars had greater HA, HAR during the rainy season in the first year (2016/2017) compared with the second year (2017/2018). The first year was the pasture establishment year, with a shorter period of water deficit (30 days less) and greater rainfall (2147 mm) than the second year (1762 mm). Our data indicate that if greater productivity is desired, Mulato II provides greater HA than Ipyporã when adequate pest monitoring and pest control are implemented. However, systems based on Mulato II will have greater risk and require more attention and decision making by managers. Although Ipyporã had lesser HA, there was no concern about spittlebugs in this severe risk region, which confirms Ipyporã as an alternative for diversification of forage-based livestock systems in the Amazon Biome.eng
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.rightsopenAccesseng
dc.subjectIpyporãeng
dc.subjectBRS RB331eng
dc.subjectMulato IIeng
dc.subjectMato Grossoeng
dc.subjectSinop-MTeng
dc.titleForage production of continuously stocked ipyporã and mulato II brachiariagrasses in the brazilian amazon.eng
dc.typeResumo em anais e proceedingseng
dc.date.updated2020-01-31T00:35:59Z
dc.subject.nalthesaurusForageeng
dc.subject.nalthesaurusUrochloa brizanthaeng
riaa.ainfo.id1119647eng
riaa.ainfo.lastupdate2020-01-30
dc.contributor.institutionBRUNO CARNEIRO E PEDREIRA, CPAMT; ISADORA PARAISO, UFMT, Sinop-MT; DÉBORA SILVA, UFMT, Sinop-MT; ANA PAULA CARVALHO, UFMT, Cuiaba-MT; LYNN E. SOLLENBERGER, UNIVERSITY of FLORIDA, Gainsville-FL; DALTON HENRIQUE PEREIRA, UFMT, Sinop-MT.eng
Aparece nas coleções:Resumo em anais de congresso (CPAMT)

Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo Descrição TamanhoFormato 
2019cpamtbrunopedreiraforagecontinuouslystockedipyporamulatoiibrazilianamazon0.pdf777,63 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
Visualizar/Abrir

FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInGoogle BookmarksMySpace