Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1123149
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFIGUEIREDO, R. de O.
dc.contributor.authorCAK, A.
dc.contributor.authorMARKEWITZ, D.
dc.contributor.otherRICARDO DE OLIVEIRA FIGUEIREDO, CNPMA; ANTHONY CAK, CUNY Advanced Science Research Center; DANIEL MARKEWITZ, The University of Georgia.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-09T04:05:31Z-
dc.date.available2020-06-09T04:05:31Z-
dc.date.created2020-06-08
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn2073-4441
dc.identifier.other16769
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1123149-
dc.descriptionAbstract: Expansion of agriculture in the Brazilian Amazon has been driven not just by demands from traditional, rural producers, but also large agriculture and cattle producers, both of whom have put considerable pressure on remaining forests and their watersheds. Monitoring of these watersheds has been a focus of intensive study for the past 20 years and although this work has greatly increased our understanding, considerable gaps still remain in our ability to provide adequate recommendations for land management and associated public policies. In this study we present a summary of findings from these previous results. For small properties, the use of fire to prepare land for cultivation remains controversial, while in large properties, forest conversion to pasture and/or crop production has had a meaningful and adverse effect on water quality. Riparian forest conservation can make a significant difference in reducing impacts of land-use change. Secondary vegetation can also play an important role in mitigating these impacts. New types of sustainable agricultural production systems, together with incentives such as payments for ecosystem service can also contribute. Continued monitoring of these changes, together with robust sustainable development plans, can help to preserve forest while still addressing the social and economic needs of Amazonian riverine inhabitants.
dc.description.uribitstream/item/213843/1/Figueiredo-agricultural-impacts-2020.pdf
dc.languageIngles
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWater, v. 12, n. 3, 2020. Article 763.
dc.relation.ispartofEmbrapa Meio Ambiente - Artigo em periódico indexado (ALICE)
dc.titleAgricultural impacts of hydrobiogeochemical cycling in the Amazon: is there any solution?
dc.typeArtigo em periódico indexado (ALICE)
dc.subject.thesagroUso da Terra
dc.subject.thesagroRecurso Hídrico
dc.subject.thesagroFloresta Tropical Úmida
dc.subject.thesagroDesmatamento
dc.subject.nalthesaurusBiogeochemistry
dc.subject.nalthesaurusDeforestation
dc.subject.nalthesaurusLand management
dc.subject.nalthesaurusLand use change
dc.subject.nalthesaurusPublic policy
dc.subject.nalthesaurusWater resources
dc.subject.nalthesaurusWatersheds
dc.ainfo.id1123149
dc.ainfo.lastupdate2020-06-23 -03:00:00
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/w12030763
Appears in Collections:Artigo em periódico indexado (CNPMA)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Figueiredo-agricultural-impacts-2020.pdf733,73 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open

FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInGoogle BookmarksMySpace