Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1123244
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorMATUK, F. A.
dc.contributor.authorTURNHOUT, E.
dc.contributor.authorFLESKENS, L.
dc.contributor.authorAMARAL, E. F. do
dc.contributor.authorHAVERROTH, M.
dc.contributor.authorBEHAGEL, J. H.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-11T04:05:20Z-
dc.date.available2020-06-11T04:05:20Z-
dc.date.created2020-06-10
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationEnvironmental Science and Policy, v. 112, p. 1-9, 2020.
dc.identifier.issn1462-9011
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1123244-
dc.descriptionEnvironmental policies that aim to enhance nature conservation, biodiversity, and well-being of Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities (IPLC) rely on knowledge integration and co-production processes that include both science and Indigenous and local knowledge (ILK) systems. While these processes are expected to safeguard the diversity of knowledge systems, uneven power relations among participants often prevent them from achieving this which can affect the legitimacy and usability of the outcomes of these processes. Using a case study in the Acre state (Brazil), where policy practitioners implemented the REDD+policy System of Incentives for Ecosystem Services in the Brazilian Kaxinawá Nova Olinda Indigenous Land, we investigate how participants manage challenges to safeguard knowledge diversity and usability during policy assessment and planning. Our findings show how, despite the use of participatory approaches, knowledge diversity ended up being compromised because policy practitioners were insufficiently attentive to power asymmetries and their implications. This, however, did not negatively affect the usability of the knowledge outcomes. Rather than focusing on the perfection of participatory methods, we call for a practical ethics that relies on culturally and ethically sensitive dialogues and that include continuous reflection. Such reflection will enable adaptation and improvisation to be able to respond to emerging power dynamics in an adequate and timely manner, thereby ensuring both the legitimacy and the usability of the outcomes of knowledge integration and co-production.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsopenAccesseng
dc.subjectPovos indígenas
dc.subjectPueblos indigenas
dc.subjectServiços ecossistêmicos
dc.subjectConhecimento tradicional
dc.subjectMétodo participativo
dc.subjectREDD+
dc.subjectServicios ecosistémicos
dc.subjectGestão participativa
dc.subjectParticipative management
dc.subjectSISA
dc.subjectTerra Indígena Kaxinawá de Nova Olinda (TIKNO)
dc.subjectFeijó (AC)
dc.subjectAcre
dc.subjectAmazônia Ocidental
dc.subjectWestern Amazon
dc.subjectAmazonia Occidental
dc.titleAllying knowledge integration and co-production for knowledge legitimacy and usability: The Amazonian SISA policy and the Kaxinawá Indigenous people case.
dc.typeArtigo de periódico
dc.subject.thesagroPlanejamento Participativo
dc.subject.nalthesaurusIndigenous peoples
dc.subject.nalthesaurusIndigenous knowledge
dc.subject.nalthesaurusEnvironmental policy
dc.subject.nalthesaurusEcosystem services
riaa.ainfo.id1123244
riaa.ainfo.lastupdate2020-06-10
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.04.018
dc.contributor.institutionFernanda Ayaviri Matuk, Wageningen University; Esther Turnhout, Wageningen University; Luuk Fleskens, Wageningen University; EUFRAN FERREIRA DO AMARAL, CPAF-AC; MOACIR HAVERROTH, CPAF-AC; Jelle Hendrik Behagel, Wageningen University.
Aparece nas coleções:Artigo em periódico indexado (CPAF-AC)

Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo Descrição TamanhoFormato 
27006.pdf5,12 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
Visualizar/Abrir
Mostrar registro simples do item Visualizar estatísticas

FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInGoogle BookmarksMySpace