Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1132907
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorSANTOS, L. M.
dc.contributor.authorOLIVEIRA, D. B. de
dc.contributor.authorCALGARO, M.
dc.contributor.authorFERREIRA, P. P. B.
dc.contributor.authorMENDONÇA, A. V. R.
dc.contributor.authorSILVA, S. de O. e
dc.contributor.authorCHAVES, A. R. de M.
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-12T18:01:15Z-
dc.date.available2021-07-12T18:01:15Z-
dc.date.created2021-07-12
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationComunicata Scientiae, v. 12, e3521, 2021.
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1132907-
dc.descriptionThe orange tree combination ?Pera? x ?Cravo? lemon has prevailed in the national territory, and new orange rootstock combinations have been developed in citrus breeding programs in order to provide the productive sector with new alternatives. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the physical and chemical characteristics of fruits from different orange canopy/rootstock combinations grown in the Brazilian semiarid. The experimental design was in randomized blocks in a factorial scheme with three canopy and four rootstock cultivars, with three replications. The orange canopies cultivars used were ?Pera,? ?Natal,? and ?Sincorá?, while the rootstock cultivars were ?Santa Cruz? Cravo lemon, the ?Sunki Tropical? tangerine selection, and the citrandarins ?Indio? and ?Riverside?. The results showed that the factors acted independently on fruit mass and diameter, number of seeds, juice yield, peel and pulp lightness, pulp chroma and hue angle, oBrix, and acid contents. However, it was different on peel thickness, peel chroma and hue angle, and SS/TA ratio. It was possible to conclude that the cultivar ?BRS 002?Sincorá? showed the best results for the physical and chemical analyses, while the ?Santa Cruz? Cravo lemon and the ?Sunki Tropical? tangerine selection influenced the best results in the physical and chemical analysis of the canopies, respectively. All combinations resulted in low juice yield.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsopenAccesseng
dc.subjectCitrandarins
dc.subjectSemiárido
dc.titlePhysical and chemical characteristics of fruits from different orange canopy/rootstock combinations grown in the brazilian semiarid.
dc.typeArtigo de periódico
dc.subject.thesagroCitricultura
dc.subject.thesagroLaranja
dc.subject.thesagroPós-Colheita
dc.subject.thesagroPorta Enxerto
dc.subject.nalthesaurusPostharvest technology
riaa.ainfo.id1132907
riaa.ainfo.lastupdate2021-07-12
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.14295/CS.v12.3521
dc.contributor.institutionLUCIANA MARTINS SANTOS; DEBORA BASTOS DE OLIVEIRA, CPAO; MARCELO CALGARO, CPATSA; PEDRO PAULO BEZERRA FERREIRA; ANDREA VITA REIS MENDONÇA; SEBASTIÃO DE OLIVEIRA E SILVA; AGNALDO RODRIGUES DE MELO CHAVES, CPATSA.
Aparece nas coleções:Artigo em periódico indexado (CPATSA)

Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo Descrição TamanhoFormato 
Physical-and-chemical-characteristics-of-fruits-2021.pdf416,66 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
Visualizar/Abrir
Mostrar registro simples do item Visualizar estatísticas

FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInGoogle BookmarksMySpace