Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1138232
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DCValorLengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorCAMMELLI, F.
dc.contributor.authorLEVY, S. A.
dc.contributor.authorGRABS, J.
dc.contributor.authorVALENTIM, J. F.
dc.contributor.authorGARRETT, R. D.
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-22T13:01:09Z-
dc.date.available2021-12-22T13:01:09Z-
dc.date.created2021-12-22
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Cleaner Production, v. 332, 130031, 2022.
dc.identifier.issn0959-6526
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1138232-
dc.descriptionTo address ongoing deforestation for global food commodities production, companies and governments have adopted a range of forest-focused supply chain policies. In the Brazilian Amazon, these policies take the form of market exclusion mechanisms, i.e., immediately dropping suppliers who have cleared their land after a specific cut-off date. Theory suggests that strict exclusionary policies such as these are likely to result in both negative livelihood effects and reduced effectiveness of the policy if some farmers are not able to comply. It is proposed that a more cooperative model of enforcement that uses flexible and negotiated approaches to compliance management may enable more marginal and disadvantaged farmers to achieve compliance, thereby improving both the effectiveness of supply chain policies and their equity. Through our case study of cattle in the Brazilian Amazon, we examine the degree to which a purportedly cooperative supply chain policy exhibits coercive tendencies at different tiers and the degree to which these tendencies influence effectiveness and equity outcomes of the policy. We show that, surprisingly, even cooperative models of enforcement are prone to exhibit coercive tendencies in multi-tier supply chains, leading to severe equity shortcomings. We provide recommendations and a research agenda to mitigate effectiveness-equity tradeoffs in multi-tier, forest-focused supply chain policies in the aim to improve the design, adoption, and implementation of such policies.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.subjectDeforestación
dc.subjectSistemas de control medioambiental
dc.subjectCadena de suministro
dc.subjectGanado
dc.titleEffectiveness-equity tradeoffs in enforcing exclusionary supply chain policies: Lessons from the Amazonian cattle sector.
dc.typeArtigo de periódico
dc.subject.thesagroDesmatamento
dc.subject.thesagroControle Ambiental
dc.subject.thesagroPolíticas Públicas
dc.subject.thesagroCadeia Produtiva
dc.subject.thesagroPecuária
dc.subject.nalthesaurusDeforestation
dc.subject.nalthesaurusEnvironmental control systems
dc.subject.nalthesaurusPublic policy
dc.subject.nalthesaurusSupply chain
dc.subject.nalthesaurusLivestock
dc.subject.nalthesaurusAmazonia
riaa.ainfo.id1138232
riaa.ainfo.lastupdate2021-12-22
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.130031
dc.contributor.institutionFEDERICO CAMMELLI, Environmental Policy Lab, ETH Zürich, Switzerland; SAMUEL A. LEVY, Environmental Policy Lab, ETH Zürich, Switzerland; JANINA GRABS, Environmental Policy Lab, ETH Zürich, Switzerland / Universitat Ramon Llull, ESADE Business School, Spain; JUDSON FERREIRA VALENTIM, CPAF-AC; RACHAEL D. GARRETT, Environmental Policy Lab, ETH Zürich, Switzerlan.
Aparece en las colecciones:Artigo em periódico indexado (CPAF-AC)

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción TamañoFormato 
27249.pdf2.08 MBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInGoogle BookmarksMySpace