Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1140750
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorVERDIN FILHO, A. C.
dc.contributor.authorARAUJO, T. C.
dc.contributor.authorFREITAS, S. de J.
dc.contributor.authorFERRAO, M. A. G.
dc.contributor.authorCOMÉRIO, M.
dc.contributor.authorANDRADE, S. de
dc.contributor.authorSENRA, J. F. de B.
dc.contributor.authorMENDONÇA, L. V. P.
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-11T15:01:40Z-
dc.date.available2022-03-11T15:01:40Z-
dc.date.created2022-03-11
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationCoffee Science, v. 16, e161975, p. 1-7, 2021.
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1140750-
dc.descriptionIn the literature, no studies investigated which portion of the plagiotropic branches should be removed by pruning conilon coffee stem cuttings, as well as the effect of the remaining length of these branches on rhizogenesis, growth, and physiology of clonal seedlings. Thus, this work aimed to evaluate the remaining length of plagiotropic branches of conilon coffee stem cuttings on the growth and physiology of conilon coffee clonal seedlings. The experiment was conducted in the Fazenda Experimental de Marilândia, ES, Brazil, under a completely randomized design with five treatments and fifteen repetitions. The treatments referred to the length of plagiotropic branches (0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, and 2.5 cm from the point of insertion with the stem). After 120 days of cultivation, vegetative growth and physiological aspects of the seedlings were evaluated. The remaining plagiotropic branches between 1.5 and 2.0 cm long provide the best vegetative growth and physiological response of the conilon coffee seedlings. The lengths that provide the worst response, both in terms of growth and physiological aspects, were 0.5 and 2.5 cm.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.titleInfluence of the cut length of plagiotropic branches in conilon coffee stem cuttings for the seedling production.
dc.typeArtigo de periódico
dc.subject.thesagroReprodução Assexuada
dc.subject.thesagroClonagem
dc.subject.thesagroProdução
dc.subject.thesagroMuda
dc.subject.thesagroEstaca
dc.subject.thesagroCoffea Canephora
dc.subject.nalthesaurusAsexual reproduction
dc.subject.nalthesaurusCloning (plants)
dc.subject.nalthesaurusSeedling production
dc.subject.nalthesaurusPlant cuttings
riaa.ainfo.id1140750
riaa.ainfo.lastupdate2022-03-11
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.25186/.v16i.1975
dc.contributor.institutionABRAÃO CARLOS VERDIN FILHO, INCAPER; TAINÁ COSTA ARAUJO, UFV; SILVIO DE JESUS FREITAS, UENF; MARIA AMELIA GAVA FERRAO, CNPCa; MARCONE COMÉRIO, INCAPER; SAUL DE ANDRADE, INCAPER; JOÃO FELIPE DE BRITES SENRA, INCAPER; LAÍS VIANA PAES MENDONÇA, UENF.
Aparece nas coleções:Artigo em periódico indexado (SAPC)

Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo Descrição TamanhoFormato 
influence-of-the-cut-length.pdf879.88 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
Visualizar/Abrir
Mostrar registro simples do item Visualizar estatísticas

FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInGoogle BookmarksMySpace