Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1143800
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DCValorLengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorCOELHO, T. L. S.
dc.contributor.authorSILVA, D. S. N.
dc.contributor.authorSANTOS JUNIOR, J. M. DOS
dc.contributor.authorDANTAS, C.
dc.contributor.authorNOGUEIRA, A. R. de A.
dc.contributor.authorLOPES JÚNIOR, C. A.
dc.contributor.authorVIEIRA, E. C.
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-07T12:20:04Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-07T12:20:04Z-
dc.date.created2022-06-07
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationUltrasonics Sonochemistry, v. 84, 105980, mar. 2022.
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1143800-
dc.descriptionCarotenoids are an essential component of cashew and can be used in pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, natural pigment, food additives, among other applications. The present work focuses on optimizing and comparing conventional and ultrasound-assisted extraction methods. Every optimization step took place with a 1:1 (w:w) mixture of yellow and red cashew apples lyophilized and ground in a cryogenic mill. A Simplex-centroid design was applied for both methods, and the solvents acetone, methanol, ethanol, and petroleum ether were evaluated. After choosing the extractor solvent, a central composite design was applied to optimize the sample mass (59?201 mg) and extraction time (6?34 min). The optimum conditions for the extractor solvent were 38% acetone, 30% ethanol, and 32% petroleum ether for CE and a mixture of 44% acetone and 56% methanol for UAE. The best experimental conditions for UAE were a sonication time of 19 min and a sample mass of 153 mg, while the CE was 23 min and 136 mg. Comparing red and yellow cashews, red cashews showed a higher carotenoid content in both methodologies. The UAE methodology was ca. 21% faster, presented a more straightforward composition of extracting solution, showed an average yield of superior carotenoid content in all samples compared to CE. Therefore, UAE has demonstrated a simple, efficient, fast, low-cost adjustment methodology and a reliable alternative for other applications involving these bioactive compounds in the studied or similar matrix.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.subjectConventional extraction
dc.subjectUltrasound assisted extraction
dc.subjectMixture design and response surface
dc.subjectCashew apple
dc.titleMultivariate optimization and comparison between conventional extraction (CE) and ultrasonic-assisted extraction (UAE) of carotenoid extraction from cashew apple.
dc.typeArtigo de periódico
dc.subject.nalthesaurusMethodology
dc.subject.nalthesaurusCarotenoids
dc.format.extent29 p.
riaa.ainfo.id1143800
riaa.ainfo.lastupdate2022-06-07
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2022.105980
dc.contributor.institutionTIAGO LINUS SILVA COELHO, UFPI; DARLISSON SLAG NERI SILVA, UFPI; JEDAIAS MARREIROS DOS SANTOS JUNIOR, UFPI; CLECIO DANTAS, UEMA; ANA RITA DE ARAUJO NOGUEIRA, CPPSE; CÍCERO ALVES LOPES JÚNIOR, University of Graz; EDIVAN CARVALHO VIEIRA, UFPI.
Aparece en las colecciones:Artigo em periódico indexado (CPPSE)

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción TamañoFormato 
MultivariateOptimizationComparison.pdf7.57 MBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInGoogle BookmarksMySpace