Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1144364
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DCValorLengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorPUNTEL, L. A.
dc.contributor.authorBOLFE, E. L.
dc.contributor.authorMELCHIORI, R. J. M.
dc.contributor.authorORTEGA, R.
dc.contributor.authorTISCORNIA, G.
dc.contributor.authorROEL, A.
dc.contributor.authorSCARAMUZZA, F.
dc.contributor.authorBEST, S.
dc.contributor.authorBERGER, A. G.
dc.contributor.authorHANSEL, D. S. S.
dc.contributor.authorPALACIOS, D. D.
dc.contributor.authorBALBOA, G.
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-29T20:19:21Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-29T20:19:21Z-
dc.date.created2022-06-29
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationIn: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PRECISION AGRICULTURE, 15., 2022, Minneapolis. Proceedings... [Monticello]: International Society of Precision Agriculture, 2022.
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1144364-
dc.descriptionAbstract. A rapidly growing population in a context of land and water scarcity, and climate change has driven an increase in healthy, nutritious, and affordable food demand while maintaining the current cropping area. Digital agriculture (DA) can contribute solutions to meet the demands in an efficient and sustainable way. South America (SA) is one of the main grain and protein producers in the world but the status of DA in the region is unknown. Systematic review of official reports and surveys, literature, and case studies from Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay, and Chile was conducted to address the following objectives: i) quantify adoption of existing DA technologies, ii) identify limitations for DA adoption, iii) summarize existing metrics to benchmark DA benefits. The Region of study showed to follow the same trend than the world on DA adoption. The level of adoption was led by Brazil and Argentina followed by Uruguay and Chile. The GPS guidance systems, mapping tools, mobile apps and remote sensing were the most adopted DA technologies in SA. While, technology cost, lack of training, limited number of companies providing services and unclear benefits from DA were the most reported limitations for adoption. Clear economic, social, and environmental metrics that track the benefits of DA could promote adoption as well as help benchmarking future research and extension projects.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.subjectAgricultura digital
dc.subjectSustentabilidade
dc.subjectAdoção de tecnologias de agricultura digital
dc.subjectInternet das coisas
dc.subjectDigital agriculture
dc.subjectSustainability
dc.subjectAdoption
dc.subjectInternet of things
dc.subjectIoT
dc.titleHow digital is agriculture in South America? Adoption and limitations.
dc.typeArtigo em anais e proceedings
dc.subject.thesagroAgricultura
dc.subject.thesagroAgricultura de Precisão
dc.subject.nalthesaurusAgriculture
dc.subject.nalthesaurusPrecision agriculture
dc.description.notesICPA 2022.
dc.format.extent2p. 1-10.
riaa.ainfo.id1144364
riaa.ainfo.lastupdate2022-06-29
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Nebraska; EDSON LUIS BOLFE, CNPTIA, Unicamp; Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria EEA Paraná, Argentina; Universidad Técnica Federico Santa María, Santiago, Chile; Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria, Las Brujas, Uruguay; Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria, Treinta y Tres, Uruguay; Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria EEA Manfredi, Argentina; Instituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias, Quilamapu, Chile; Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria, Colonia, Uruguay; Droptec Agri, Santa Catarina; Colegio de Ingenieros Agronómos, Chile; University of Nebraska.
Aparece en las colecciones:Artigo em anais de congresso (CNPTIA)

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción TamañoFormato 
PC-How-Digital-is-Agriculture-ICPA-2022.pdf2.31 MBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInGoogle BookmarksMySpace