Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1154944
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSILVA, A. M. M.eng
dc.contributor.authorJONES, D. L.eng
dc.contributor.authorCHADWICK, D. R.eng
dc.contributor.authorQI, X.eng
dc.contributor.authorCOTTA, S. R.eng
dc.contributor.authorARAÚJO, V. L. V. P.eng
dc.contributor.authorMATTEOLI, F. P.eng
dc.contributor.authorLACERDA-JÚNIOR, G. V.eng
dc.contributor.authorPEREIRA, A. P. A.eng
dc.contributor.authorFERNANDES JUNIOR, P. I.eng
dc.contributor.authorCARDOSO, E. J. B. N.eng
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-14T12:24:05Z-
dc.date.available2023-07-14T12:24:05Z-
dc.date.created2023-07-14
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationMicrobiological Research, v. 271, 127350, 2023.
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1154944-
dc.descriptionArbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) are able to provide key ecosystem services, protecting plants against biotic and abiotic stresses. Here, we hypothesized that a combination of AMF (Rhizophagus clarus) and PGPR (Bacillus sp.) could enhance 33P uptake in maize plants under soil water stress. A microcosm experiment using mesh exclusion and a radiolabeled phosphorus tracer (33P) was installed using three types of inoculation: i) only AMF, ii) only PGPR, and iii) a consortium of AMF and PGPR, alongside a control treatment without inoculation. For all treatments, a gradient of three water-holding capacities (WHC) was considered i) 30% (severe drought), ii) 50% (moderate drought), and iii) 80% (optimal condition, no water stress). In severe drought conditions, AMF root colonization of dual-inoculated plants was significantly lower compared to individual inoculation of the AMF, whilst 33P uptake by dual-inoculated plants or plants inoculated with bacteria was 2.4-fold greater than the uninoculated treatment. Under moderate drought conditions the use of AMF promoted the highest 33P uptake by plants, increasing it by 2.1-fold, when compared to the uninoculated treatment. Without drought stress, AMF showed the lowest 33P uptake and, overall, plant P acquisition was lower for all inoculation types when compared to the severe and moderate drought treatments. The total shoot P content was modulated by the water-holding capacity and inoculation type, with the lowest values observed under severe drought and the highest values under moderate drought. The highest soil electrical conductivity (EC) values were found under severe drought in AMF-inoculated plants and the lowest EC for no drought in single or dual-inoculated plants. Furthermore, water-holding capacity influenced the total soil bacterial and mycorrhizal abundance over time, with the highest abundances being found under severe and moderate drought. This study demonstrates that the positive influence of microbial inoculation on 33P uptake by plants varied with soil water gradient. Furthermore, under severe stress conditions, AMF invested more in the production of hyphae, vesicles and spore production, indicating a significant carbon drain from the host plant as evidenced by the lack of translation of increased 33P uptake into biomass. Therefore, under severe drought the use of bacteria or dual-inoculation seems to be more effective than individual AMF inoculation in terms of 33P uptake by plants, while under moderate drought, the use of AMF stood out.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.subjectArbuscular mycorrhizal fungi
dc.subjectFungos micorrízicos arbusculares
dc.subjectNutrição de fosfato
dc.subjectRastreador de isótopos
dc.subjectFalta de água
dc.subjectSimbiose vegetal
dc.subjectMicróbios que vivem no solo
dc.subjectEstresse hídrico
dc.subjectCrescimento vegetal
dc.titleCan arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and rhizobacteria facilitate P33 uptake in maize plants under water stress?
dc.typeArtigo de periódico
dc.subject.thesagroMilho
dc.subject.thesagroMicrobiologia
dc.subject.thesagroMicrobiologia do Solo
dc.subject.nalthesaurusWater shortages
dc.subject.nalthesaurusMicrobiology
riaa.ainfo.id1154944
riaa.ainfo.lastupdate2023-07-14
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2023.127350
dc.contributor.institutionANTONIO M. M. SILVA, ESALQeng
dc.contributor.institutionDAVEY L. JONES, School of Natural Sciences, Bangor University, United Kingdomeng
dc.contributor.institutionDAVE R. CHADWICK, School of Natural Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, United Kingdomeng
dc.contributor.institutionXUE QI, School of Natural Sciences, Bangor University, United Kingdomeng
dc.contributor.institutionSIMONE R. COTTA, USP/CENAeng
dc.contributor.institutionVICTOR L. V. P. ARAÚJO, ESALQeng
dc.contributor.institutionFILIPE P. MATTEOLI, Laboratory of Microbial Bioinformatics, Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Sciences, São Paulo State University, Baurueng
dc.contributor.institutionGILENO V. LACERDA JÚNIOReng
dc.contributor.institutionARTHUR P. A. PEREIRA, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, CEeng
dc.contributor.institutionPAULO IVAN FERNANDES JUNIOR, CPATSAeng
dc.contributor.institutionELKE J. B. N. CARDOSO, ESALQ.eng
Appears in Collections:Artigo em periódico indexado (CPATSA)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Can-arbuscular-mycorrhizal-fungi-and-rhizobacteria-facilitate-2023.pdf5.02 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record

FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInGoogle BookmarksMySpace