Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1155216
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DCValorLengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorMOTA, P. K.
dc.contributor.authorCOSTA, A. M. da
dc.contributor.authorPRADO, R. B.
dc.contributor.authorFERNANDES, L. F. S.
dc.contributor.authorPISSARRA, T. C. T.
dc.contributor.authorPACHECO, F. A. L.
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-03T12:24:14Z-
dc.date.available2023-08-03T12:24:14Z-
dc.date.created2023-07-24
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationScience of the Total Environment, v. 899, 165639, Nov. 2023.
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1155216-
dc.descriptionThe Payment for Environmental Services (PES) is often conceived through complex schemes without a clear definition of all concepts involved. This study presents the results of a systematic literature review on PES schemes in Brazil, accompanied by a critical assessment of their efficacy for potential environmental gains. The PES approaches were grouped into six categories based on the research focus, and those that were focused on PES policies were identified as the most studied. A particular emphasis has been given to the Amazon and Atlantic Forest biomes, where the ecosystem services studied were mostly centered on issues related to carbon and water, respectively. Approximately one-third of all schemes provided no clear definition of which ecosystem services are proposed for payment. In addition, the review showed no consensus among studies on the definition of services in similar schemes. Most schemes presented no payment system conditioned on the provision of environmental services. Furthermore, the review showed that the absence of clarity in the application of concepts may hinder the development of public policies to properly implement PES in Brazil. The conclusion is that standardizing terms used in the literature and in PES schemes is critical; therefore, the use of the Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES) as a reference is recommended to ensure clarity, objectivity and, more importantly, the expected environmental efficacy.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.subjectCommon International Classification of Ecosystem Services
dc.subjectServiços ecossistêmicos
dc.titlePayment for environmental services: a critical review of schemes, concepts, and practice in Brazil.
dc.typeArtigo de periódico
dc.subject.thesagroPolíticas Públicas
dc.subject.thesagroCarbono
dc.subject.thesagroÁgua
dc.subject.nalthesaurusEcosystem services
dc.subject.nalthesaurusPublic policy
dc.subject.nalthesaurusCarbon
dc.subject.nalthesaurusWater
riaa.ainfo.id1155216
riaa.ainfo.lastupdate2023-08-03
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165639
dc.contributor.institutionPAULA KAREN MOTA, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE MINAS GERAIS; ADRIANA MONTEIRO DA COSTA, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE MINAS GERAIS; RACHEL BARDY PRADO, CNPS; LUÍS FILIPE SANCHES FERNANDES, UNIVERSITY OF TRÁS-OS-MONTES AND ALTO DOURO; TERESA CRISTINA TARLÉ PISSARRA, UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL PAULISTA; FERNANDO ANTÓNIO LEAL PACHECO, UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL PAULISTA; UNIVERSITY OF TRÁS-OS-MONTES AND ALTO DOURO.
Aparece en las colecciones:Artigo em periódico indexado (CNPS)

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción TamañoFormato 
Payment-for-environmental-services-2023.pdf2.71 MBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInGoogle BookmarksMySpace