Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1160015
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DCValorLengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorSCARPARE, F. V.
dc.contributor.authorZOTELLI, L. do C.
dc.contributor.authorBARIZON, R. R. M.
dc.contributor.authorCASTRO, S. G. Q. de
dc.contributor.authorBEZERRA, A. H. F.
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-19T14:33:00Z-
dc.date.available2023-12-19T14:33:00Z-
dc.date.created2023-12-19
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationSustainability, v. 15, n. 8, article 6990, 2023.
dc.identifier.issn2071-1050
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1160015-
dc.descriptionAbstract: Sugarcane cultivation uses many chemical inputs to ensure good yields, which puts local water resources under pressure. Grey water footprint (GWF) is a widely used indicator of the volume needed to assimilate a pollutant load in a water body. However, the GWF relies on leaching runoff fractions, which are empirically determined. We hypothesize that these fractions might not represent the true magnitude of the Brazilian sugarcane environment and that management practices can further reduce this fraction loaded into the environment. In two field trials, we measure the herbicides and nitrate loaded into the environment through in situ measurements, determine their loss fractions, compare them with some empirical models, calculate the GWF, and estimate the potential for nitrate pollution attenuation with the adoption of split and incorporated nitrogen application. Both hypotheses are confirmed. For nitrate, our results suggest that the leaching runoff fraction used in most GWF studies is overestimated by about two times, impacting the GWF estimation for the Brazilian sugarcane environment. However, the same conclusion was not possible for herbicides due to the low diversity of the analyzed molecules. In addition, the fertilizer management application reduced the nitrate load on the environment, which the GWF did not necessarily detect.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.subjectGrey water footprint
dc.titleLeaching runoff fraction for nitrate and herbicides on sugarcane fields: implications for grey water footprint.
dc.typeArtigo de periódico
dc.subject.thesagroHerbicidaeng
dc.subject.thesagroPoluição da Águaeng
dc.subject.thesagroRecurso Hídricoeng
dc.subject.thesagroImpacto Ambientaleng
dc.subject.thesagroCana de Açúcareng
dc.subject.thesagroNitratoeng
dc.subject.nalthesaurusWater pollutioneng
dc.subject.nalthesaurusNitrateseng
dc.subject.nalthesaurusEnvironmental impacteng
dc.subject.nalthesaurusWater qualityeng
dc.subject.nalthesaurusWater quality standardseng
dc.subject.nalthesaurusHerbicideseng
dc.subject.nalthesaurusDiuroneng
dc.subject.nalthesaurusHexazinoneeng
riaa.ainfo.id1160015
riaa.ainfo.lastupdate2023-12-19
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/su15086990
dc.contributor.institutionFABIO VALE SCARPARE, WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY; LUCIANA DO CARMO ZOTELLI, UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DE CAMPINAS; ROBSON ROLLAND MONTICELLI BARIZON, CNPMA; SERGIO GUSTAVO QUASSI DE CASTRO, CENTRO NACIONAL DE PESQUISA EM ENERGIA E MATERIAIS; ANDRE HERMAN FREIRE BEZERRA, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO RIO GRANDE DO NORTE.
Aparece en las colecciones:Artigo em periódico indexado (CNPMA)

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción TamañoFormato 
Barizon-Leaching-runoff-2023.pdf2,77 MBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInGoogle BookmarksMySpace