Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1182241
Título: Modeling herbaceous biomass and assessing degradation risk in the Caatinga biome using Monte Carlo Simulation.
Autoria: FIGUEIREDO, J. R. de O.
PEREIRA FILHO, J. M.
FEITOSA, J. F. de F.
CÂNDIDO, M. J. D.
GILLES, S.
BAKKE, O. A.
MARANHÃO, S. R.
CAVALCANTE, A. C. R.
EDVAN, R. L.
BEZERRA, L. R.
Afiliação: JEFTA RUAMA DE OLIVEIRA FIGUEIREDO, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE CAMPINA GRANDE; JOSÉ MORAIS PEREIRA FILHO, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE CAMPINA GRANDE; JEFFERSON FERREIRA DE FREITAS FEITOSA, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO CEARA; MAGNO JOSÉ DUARTE CÂNDIDO, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO CEARA; SONEL GILLES, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE CAMPINA GRANDE; OLAF ANDREAS BAKKE, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE CAMPINA GRANDE; SAMUEL ROCHA MARANHÃO, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO CEARA; ANA CLARA RODRIGUES CAVALCANTE, CNPC; RICARDO LOIOLA EDVAN, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE CAMPINA GRANDE; UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO PIAUI; LEILSON ROCHA BEZERRA, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE CAMPINA GRANDE.
Ano de publicação: 2025
Referência: Sustainability, v. 17, n. 16, 7267, 2025.
Conteúdo: Abstract: Simulating scenarios under climate change is essential to understanding vegetation dynamics, ensuring the survival of forage species, and minimizing uncertainties in project costs and timelines. This study aimed to simulate historical probabilities and develop a biomass production model using PHYGROW software (Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA), combined with Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS) in the @RISK program (Ithaca, NY, USA), to evaluate long-term biomass production in a native pasture area of the Caatinga biome. The results show strong agreement between software estimates and field data. For 2016, PHYGROW estimated 883 kg/ha, while field measurements reached 836.8 kg/ha; for 2017, 1117 kg/ha was estimated, while 992.15 kg/ha was observed. For 2018, the model estimated 1200 kg/ha compared with 1763.5 kg/ha in the field, and for 2019, 1230 kg/ha was estimated versus the 1294.3 kg/ha observed. The Monte Carlo simulations indicated that the Weibull distribution best fitted the synthetic series, with 90% adherence. Biomass production values ranged from 618 to 1427 kg/ha with a 90% probability. Only 5% of the simulations projected values below 600 kg/ha or above 1400 kg/ha. Moreover, there was a 95% risk of production issues if planning was based on biomass values above 1000 kg/ha. These findings highlight PHYGROW’s potential for pasture management under semi-arid conditions for predicting and avoiding degradation scenarios that could even lead to areas of desertification.
Thesagro: Caatinga
Pastagem Nativa
Biomassa
NAL Thesaurus: Environmental sustainability
Prediction
Biomass production
Livestock
Herbaceous plants
Semiarid zones
Brazil
Palavras-chave: Dynamic systems
Production model
Forecasting models
Native pasture
Digital Object Identifier: https://doi.org/10.3390/su17167267
Tipo do material: Artigo de periódico
Acesso: openAccess
Aparece nas coleções:Artigo em periódico indexado (CNPC)

Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo Descrição TamanhoFormato 
CNPC-2025-Modeling-herbaceous-biomass.pdf4,65 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
Visualizar/Abrir

FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInGoogle BookmarksMySpace