Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1183306
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorVIEIRA, R. F.
dc.contributor.authorLUIZ, A. J. B.
dc.contributor.authorRAMOS, N. P.
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-05T15:48:40Z-
dc.date.available2026-01-05T15:48:40Z-
dc.date.created2026-01-05
dc.date.issued2025
dc.identifier.citationAgronomy Research, v. 23, S. 2, p. 666–685, 2025.
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1183306-
dc.descriptionAbstract: Due to the rising demand for bioenergy, a certain amount of sugarcane straw is often removed for ethanol production, but this practice may compromise health soil. In addition to the amount of straw, growing concern with the environment has made the use of diazotrophic plant-growth promotion bacteria (DPGPB) an alternative to the use of nitrogen fertilizers. A research was designed with the aim of evaluating the effect of different amounts of straw kept on the soil on soil microbial and enzymatic parameters and on sugarcane yield during the first ratoon. The field experiment was carried out in randomized blocks, using nitrogen fertilizer (NF) or DPGPB (BI), both with four straw levels. The parameters evaluated were: β-glucosidase (GA), urease (UR) and acid phosphatase (APA) activities, fluorescein diacetate activity, basal soil respiration, microbial biomass N, total C, total N and labile carbon. Responses were not obtained for various parameters with respect to the straw levels which was attributed to the short experimental period. In general, the evaluated parameters were always higher in the BI treatment, except for APA, which was lower in this treatment. This fact could be attributed to the greater capacity of the inoculated plants to make phosphorus available to the plants, which could reduce APA. The absence of a response for sugarcane yield between the NF and BI treatments demonstrates the beneficial effect of the bacteria in the inoculant in suppressing plants with adequate nitrogen contents. Greater yields were obtained for the L64 and L100 straw levels with no significant difference. This demonstrates the adequateness of removing part of the straw to produce second generation ethanol.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.subjectPlant growth-promoting microorganisms
dc.subjectNitrogen fertilizer
dc.subjectSoil microbial activity
dc.titleDiazotrophic plant growth-promotion bacteria and sugarcane straw levels: effects on sugarcane productivity and on soil enzymatic and microbiological activities.
dc.typeArtigo de periódico
dc.subject.thesagroEstimulante de Crescimento Vegetal
dc.subject.thesagroBactéria
dc.subject.thesagroBactéria não Patogênica
dc.subject.thesagroCana de Açúcar
dc.subject.thesagroPalha
dc.subject.nalthesaurusGrowth promotion
dc.subject.nalthesaurusBacillus (bacteria)
dc.subject.nalthesaurusStraw
dc.subject.nalthesaurusSugarcane
dc.subject.nalthesaurusNitrogen fixation
riaa.ainfo.id1183306
riaa.ainfo.lastupdate2026-01-05
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.15159/AR.25.006
dc.contributor.institutionROSANA FARIA VIEIRA, CNPMA; ALFREDO JOSE BARRETO LUIZ, CNPMA; NILZA PATRICIA RAMOS, CNPMA.
Aparece nas coleções:Artigo em periódico indexado (CNPMA)

Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo Descrição TamanhoFormato 
Diazotrophic-plant-growth-promotion-bacteria-2025.pdf627,69 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
Visualizar/Abrir
Mostrar registro simples do item Visualizar estatísticas

FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInGoogle BookmarksMySpace