Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1185424
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorALMEIDA, K. M.
dc.contributor.authorMARANGON, B. B.
dc.contributor.authorRIBEIRO, V. J.
dc.contributor.authorCASTRO, J. de S.
dc.contributor.authorSILVA, J. da
dc.contributor.authorMATTIELLO, E. M.
dc.contributor.authorSILVA, A. A. de S.
dc.contributor.authorSILVA, E. C. M.
dc.contributor.authorCALIJURI, M. L.
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-16T14:49:09Z-
dc.date.available2026-03-16T14:49:09Z-
dc.date.created2026-03-16
dc.date.issued2025
dc.identifier.citationACS Omega, v. 10, n. 48, p. 59208–59218, Nov. 2025.
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1185424-
dc.descriptionAbstract: This study evaluated the technical and environmental feasibility of using wastewater-cultivated microalgae biomass as a nutrient source for tomato plants. A field experiment tested different foliar application doses of microalgae biomass (control, 0.5%, 2.5%, 5%, and 10%) on tomato plants. Postharvest analysis of eight plant and fruit parameters showed no significant differences among treatments. Environmental feasibility was assessed through life cycle assessment, comparing a baseline scenario (mineral fertilizer) with an alternative scenario in which microalgae biomass was used as both a nutrient and water source. The Ecoinvent database and ReCiPe 2016 methodology were applied at both midpoint and end point levels. The alternative scenario demonstrated reduced environmental impacts across all 18 midpoint categories, including substantial reductions in water consumption (107.43%) and ionizing radiation (53.54%). At the end point level, the baseline scenario had 23.05% higher impact in the human health category than the alternative.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.subjectÁgua residual
dc.titleMicroalgae cultivated in industrial wastewater as agricultural bioinputs: technical and life cycle assessment to support sustainable production.
dc.typeArtigo de periódico
dc.subject.thesagroMicroalga
dc.subject.thesagroBiomassa
dc.subject.thesagroTomate
dc.subject.nalthesaurusMicroalgae
dc.subject.nalthesaurusWastewater
dc.subject.nalthesaurusBiomass
dc.subject.nalthesaurusTomatoes
riaa.ainfo.id1185424
riaa.ainfo.lastupdate2026-03-16
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.5c08477
dc.contributor.institutionKAROLINE MATIELLO ALMEIDA, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE VIÇOSA; BIANCA BARROS MARANGON, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE VIÇOSA; VINÍCIUS JOSÉ RIBEIRO, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE VIÇOSA; JACKELINE DE SIQUEIRA CASTRO, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE VIÇOSA; JUSCIMAR DA SILVA, CNPH; EDSON MARCIO MATTIELLO, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE VIÇOSA; ANDREIA APARECIDA DE SOUSA SILVA; EDUARDA CRISTINA MOREIRA SILVA; MARIA LÚCIA CALIJURI, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE VIÇOSA.
Aparece nas coleções:Artigo em periódico indexado (CNPH)

Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo TamanhoFormato 
microalgae-cultivated-industrial-wastewater.pdf4,97 MBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir
Mostrar registro simples do item Visualizar estatísticas

FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInGoogle BookmarksMySpace