Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1187265
Título: Parity and season affect the performance of an automated activity monitoring system for estrus detection in grazing girolando cows.
Autoria: OLIVEIRA, S. A. S. de
FIGUEIREDO, R. A.
VIANA, J. H. M.
FÉRES, L. L. dos S.
FÉRES, L. F. R.
SANTOS, R. M. dos
MARTINS, C. F.
FERREIRA, I. C.
Afiliação: SARA ADNA SANTOS DE OLIVEIRA, FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF UBERLANDIA; RICARDO ALAMINO FIGUEIREDO, CENARGEN; JOAO HENRIQUE MOREIRA VIANA, CENARGEN; LIVIA LOIOLA DOS SANTOS FÉRES, EPAMIG (AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH AGENCY OF THE STATE OF MINAS GERAIS); LUIZ FERNANDO RODRIGUES FÉRES, EPAMIG (AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH AGENCY OF THE STATE OF MINAS GERAIS); RICARDA MARIA DOS SANTOS, FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF UBERLANDIA; CARLOS FREDERICO MARTINS, CPAC; ISABEL CRISTINA FERREIRA, FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF UBERLANDIA.
Ano de publicação: 2026
Referência: Veterinary Medicine International, 8201912, 2026.
Conteúdo: Accurate estrus detection in grazing crossbred dairy cows (Zebu × Taurine) remains challenging in Brazil, and automated activity monitoring (AAM) systems may be a viable alternative. This study evaluated the effects of management and environmental factors on AAM performance for estrus detection in grazing Girolando cows. Nonpregnant 5/8 Gir × Holstein cows (n = 25) were monitored during both dry and rainy seasons. During the dry season, cows were managed in semiconfinement with corn silage supplementation. In the rainy season, they grazed Panicum maximum cv. Mombaça pastures with or without eucalyptus trees. Each cow wore an AAM collar (CowMed, Brazil), and after individual baseline calibration, cows followed a timed artificial insemination (TAI) protocol. A statistical model included season, location, parity, and detection method (AAM, visual observation [VO], adhesive patches [APs]) as fixed effects. Cow and cow × season interaction were random effects. Multiparous cows had higher estrus detection probabilities (97%) compared to primiparous cows (85%), regardless of method, location, or season. AAM detection probability was higher during the rainy season (98%) than during the dry season (73%). For AP, the detection probability was 80% in the rainy season and 97% in the dry season. VO detection remained stable at 92% in the dry season and 95% in the rainy season. Based on corpus luteum (CL) presence, AAM sensitivity and accuracy were 85% and 75%, respectively, while specificity was 33%. Parity and seasonal management significantly influenced AAM performance. The generally low specificity across detection methods highlights the need for improved algorithms and integrated estrus detection strategies in grazing systems.
Palavras-chave: Girolando cows
Crossbred dairy cows
Automated activity monitoring (AAM) systems
Digital Object Identifier: https://doi.org/10.1155/vmi/8201912
Tipo do material: Artigo de periódico
Acesso: openAccess
Aparece nas coleções:Artigo em periódico indexado (CENARGEN)


FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInGoogle BookmarksMySpace