Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem:
http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/17039
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC | Valor | Lengua/Idioma |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | LU, D. | pt_BR |
dc.contributor.author | MAUSEL, P. | pt_BR |
dc.contributor.author | BATISTELLA, M. | pt_BR |
dc.contributor.author | MORAN, E. | pt_BR |
dc.date.accessioned | 2011-04-10T11:11:11Z | pt_BR |
dc.date.available | 2011-04-10T11:11:11Z | pt_BR |
dc.date.created | 2004-04-29 | pt_BR |
dc.date.issued | 2004 | pt_BR |
dc.identifier.citation | Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, v. 70, n. 6, p. 723-731, jun. 2004. | pt_BR |
dc.identifier.uri | http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/17039 | pt_BR |
dc.description | Four distinctly different classifiers were used to analyze multispectral data. Which of these classifiers is most suitable for a specific study area is not always clear. This paper provides a comparison of minimum-distance classifier (MDC), maximumlikelihood classifier (MLC), extraction and classification of homogeneous objects (ECHO), and decision-tree classifier based on linear spectral mixture analysis (DTC-LSMA). Each of the classifiers used both Landsat Thematic Mapper data and identical field-based training sample datasets in a western Brazilian Amazon study area. Seven land-cover classes? mature forest, advanced secondary succession, initial secondary succession, pasture lands, agricultural lands, bare lands, and water?were classified. Classification results indicate that the DTC-LSMA and ECHO classifiers were more accurate than were the MDC and MLC. The overall accuracy of the DTCLSMA approach was 86 percent with a 0.82 kappa coefficient and ECHO had an accuracy of 83 percent with a 0.79 kappa coefficient. The accuracy of the other classifiers ranged from 77 to 80 percent with kappa coefficients from 0.72 to 0.75. | pt_BR |
dc.language.iso | eng | eng |
dc.rights | openAccess | eng |
dc.subject | Mapeamento | pt_BR |
dc.subject | Amazonia brasileira | pt_BR |
dc.subject | Amazonas | pt_BR |
dc.title | Comparison of land-cover classification methods in the Brazilian Amazon Basin. | pt_BR |
dc.type | Artigo de periódico | pt_BR |
dc.date.updated | 2015-03-30T11:11:11Z | pt_BR |
dc.subject.thesagro | Bacia Hidrográfica | pt_BR |
dc.subject.thesagro | Floresta Tropical Úmida | pt_BR |
dc.subject.thesagro | Satélite | pt_BR |
riaa.ainfo.id | 17039 | pt_BR |
riaa.ainfo.lastupdate | 2015-03-30 | pt_BR |
dc.contributor.institution | 1-2 e 4: Indiana University; 3: Embrapa Monitoramento por Satélite. | pt_BR |
Aparece en las colecciones: | Artigo em periódico indexado (CNPM)![]() ![]() |
Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero | Descripción | Tamaño | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|---|
1146.pdf | 218.66 kB | Adobe PDF | ![]() Visualizar/Abrir |