Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/183695
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DCValorLengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorALLEM, A. C.
dc.date.accessioned2026-04-29T17:53:06Z-
dc.date.available2026-04-29T17:53:06Z-
dc.date.created2002-08-06
dc.date.issued1999
dc.identifier.citationIn: SIMPOSIO DE RECURSOS GENETICOS PARA AMERICA LATINA E CARIBE, 2., 1999, Brasilia, DF. Anais... Brasilia: Embrapa Recursos Geneticos e Biotecnologia, 1999.
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/183695-
dc.descriptionThe argument advanced stresses the fact that the controversy raised does not revolve around idiosyncratic interpretation. Rather, the polemic touches the very core of scientific epistemology and its foundations. The study gives particular attention to article 2 (‘use of terms’) of the Convention on Biological Diversity which shows conceptual inconsistencies.
dc.formatCD-ROM.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.subjectRecurso biologico
dc.titleDubious concepts in the convention on biological diversity with special reference to genetic resource, biological resource, biodiversity.
dc.typeAnais e Proceedings de eventos
dc.subject.thesagroBiodiversidade
dc.subject.thesagroRecurso Genético
riaa.ainfo.id183695
riaa.ainfo.lastupdate2026-04-29
Aparece en las colecciones:Resumo em anais de congresso (CENARGEN)

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción TamañoFormato 
22436.pdf4,75 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir

FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInGoogle BookmarksMySpace