Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/183695
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorALLEM, A. C.
dc.date.accessioned2026-04-29T17:53:06Z-
dc.date.available2026-04-29T17:53:06Z-
dc.date.created2002-08-06
dc.date.issued1999
dc.identifier.citationIn: SIMPOSIO DE RECURSOS GENETICOS PARA AMERICA LATINA E CARIBE, 2., 1999, Brasilia, DF. Anais... Brasilia: Embrapa Recursos Geneticos e Biotecnologia, 1999.
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/183695-
dc.descriptionThe argument advanced stresses the fact that the controversy raised does not revolve around idiosyncratic interpretation. Rather, the polemic touches the very core of scientific epistemology and its foundations. The study gives particular attention to article 2 (‘use of terms’) of the Convention on Biological Diversity which shows conceptual inconsistencies.
dc.formatCD-ROM.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.subjectRecurso biologico
dc.titleDubious concepts in the convention on biological diversity with special reference to genetic resource, biological resource, biodiversity.
dc.typeAnais e Proceedings de eventos
dc.subject.thesagroBiodiversidade
dc.subject.thesagroRecurso Genético
riaa.ainfo.id183695
riaa.ainfo.lastupdate2026-04-29
Appears in Collections:Resumo em anais de congresso (CENARGEN)

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
22436.pdf4,75 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInGoogle BookmarksMySpace