Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/874543
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorHEINEMANN, A. B.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorSTONE, L. F.pt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2011-04-09T14:45:19Z-
dc.date.available2011-04-09T14:45:19Z-
dc.date.created2011-01-26pt_BR
dc.date.issued2010pt_BR
dc.identifier.citationIn: INTERNATIONAL RICE CONGRESS, 3., 2010, Hanoi, Vietnam. Rice for future generations: abstracts. Hanoi: Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development; Los Baños: International Rice Research Institute, 2010.pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/874543pt_BR
dc.descriptionTwo modern cultivars and one traditional cultivar were submitted to two water regimes, potential growth and water deficit, after the panicle differentiation. It was observed that modern upland rice cultivars had different response to drought than traditional cultivar.pt_BR
dc.format1 CD-ROM.pt_BR
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.rightsopenAccesseng
dc.titleResponse of traditional and modern upland rice cultivars to drought.pt_BR
dc.typeResumo em anais e proceedingspt_BR
dc.date.updated2011-04-10T11:11:11Zpt_BR
dc.subject.thesagroArrozpt_BR
dc.subject.thesagroOryza sativapt_BR
dc.subject.thesagroDeficiência hídricapt_BR
dc.subject.thesagroCerradopt_BR
riaa.ainfo.id874543pt_BR
riaa.ainfo.lastupdate2011-01-26pt_BR
dc.contributor.institutionALEXANDRE BRYAN HEINEMANN, CNPAF; LUIS FERNANDO STONE, CNPAF.pt_BR
Aparece nas coleções:Resumo em anais de congresso (CNPAF)

Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo Descrição TamanhoFormato 
3994.pdf41,35 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
Visualizar/Abrir

FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInGoogle BookmarksMySpace