Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/890936
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBRITO, L. G.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorBARBIERI, F. da S.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorROCHA, R. B.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorOLIVEIRA, M. C. de S.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorRIBEIRO, E. S.pt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2011-06-08T11:11:11Zpt_BR
dc.date.available2011-06-08T11:11:11Zpt_BR
dc.date.created2011-06-08pt_BR
dc.date.issued2011pt_BR
dc.identifier.citationVeterinary Medicine International, apr. 2011, 806093.pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn2042-0048eng
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/890936pt_BR
dc.descriptionThe adult immersion test (AIT) was used to evaluate the efficacy of acaricide molecules used for control of Rhipicephalus microplus on 106 populations collected in five municipalities in the state of Rondônia in the Brazilian South Occidental Amazon region. The analysis of the data showed that the acaricide formulations had different efficacies on the tick populations surveyed. The synthetic pyrethroids (SPs) acaricides were the least effective (48.35?76.84%), followed by SP + organophosphate (OP) associations (68.91?81.47%) and amidine (51.35?100%). For the macrocyclic lactones (MLs), the milbemycin (94.84?100%) was the most effective, followed by spinosad (93.21?100%) and the avermectins (81.34?100%). The phenylpyrazole (PZ) group had similar efficacy (99.90%) to the MLs. Therefore, SP acaricides, including associations with OP, and formulations based on amidine presented low in vitro efficacy to control the R. microplus populations surveyed.eng
dc.language.isoengpt_BR
dc.rightsopenAccesseng
dc.subjectCattle tickpt_BR
dc.subjectControlpt_BR
dc.subjectAcaridespt_BR
dc.titleEvaluation of the efficacy of acaricides used to control the cattle tick, Rhipicephalus microplus, in dairy herds raised in the Brazilian Southwestern Amazon.pt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de periódicopt_BR
dc.date.updated2012-03-30T11:11:11Zpt_BR
dc.format.extent26 p.eng
riaa.ainfo.id890936pt_BR
riaa.ainfo.lastupdate2012-03-30pt_BR
dc.identifier.doi10.4061/2011/806093eng
dc.contributor.institutionLUCIANA GATTO BRITO, CPAF-RO; FABIO DA SILVA BARBIERI, CPAF-RO; RODRIGO BARROS ROCHA, CPAF-RO; MARCIA CRISTINA DE SENA OLIVEIRA, CPPSE; ELISANA SALES RIBEIRO, CPAF-RO.pt_BR
Appears in Collections:Artigo em periódico indexado (CPPSE)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
PROCI2011.00028.pdf675,93 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record

FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInGoogle BookmarksMySpace