Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/924819
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorLI, G.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorLU, D.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorDUTRA, L.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorBATISTELLA, M.pt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2014-09-17T07:35:35Z-
dc.date.available2014-09-17T07:35:35Z-
dc.date.created2012-05-17pt_BR
dc.date.issued2012pt_BR
dc.identifier.citationISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, v. 70, p. 26-38, 2012.pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/924819pt_BR
dc.descriptionThis paper explores the use of ALOS (Advanced Land Observing Satellite) PALSARL-band (Phased Array type L-band Synthetic Aperture Radar) and RADARSAT-2 C-band data for land-cover classification in a tropical moist region. Transformed divergence was used to identify potential textural images which were calculated with the gray-level co-occurrence matrix method. The standard deviation of selected textural images and correlation coefficients between them were then used to determine the best combination of texture images for land-cover classification. Classification results based on different scenarios with maximum likelihood classifier were compared. Based on the identified best scenarios, different classification algorithms ? maximum likelihood classifier, classification tree analysis, Fuzzy ARTMAP (a neural-network method), k-nearest neighbor, object-based classification, and support vector machine were compared for examining which algorithm was suitable for land-cover classification in the tropical moist region. This research indicates that the combination of radiometric images and their textures provided considerably better classification accuracies than individual datasets. The L-band data provided much better landcover classification than C-band data but neither L-band nor C-band was suitable for fine land-cover classification system, no matter which classification algorithm was used. L-band data provided reasonably good classification accuracies for coarse land-cover classification system such as forest, succession, agropasture, water, wetland, and urban with an overall classification accuracy of 72.2%, but C-band data provided only 54.7%. Compared to the maximum likelihood classifier, both classification tree analysis and Fuzzy ARTMAP provided better performances, object-based classification and support vector machine had similar performances, and k-nearest neighbor performed poorly. More research should address the use of multitemporal radar data and the integration of radar and optical sensor data for improving land-cover classification.pt_BR
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.rightsopenAccesseng
dc.subjectALOS PALSARpt_BR
dc.subjectRADARSATpt_BR
dc.subjectLand-cover classificationpt_BR
dc.subjectAmazonpt_BR
dc.titleA comparative analysis of ALOS PALSAR L-band and RADARSAT-2 C-band data for land-cover classification in a tropical moist region.pt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de periódicopt_BR
dc.date.updated2014-09-17T07:35:35Zpt_BR
dc.subject.nalthesaurustexturept_BR
dc.format.extent2p. 26-38.pt_BR
riaa.ainfo.id924819pt_BR
riaa.ainfo.lastupdate2014-09-16pt_BR
dc.contributor.institutionGUIYING LI, INDIANA UNIVERSITY; DENGSHENG LU, INDIANA UNIVERSITY; LUCIANO DUTRA, INPE; MATEUS BATISTELLA, CNPM.pt_BR
Aparece nas coleções:Artigo em periódico indexado (CNPM)

Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo Descrição TamanhoFormato 
MateusISPRS.pdf2,25 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
Visualizar/Abrir
Mostrar registro simples do item Visualizar estatísticas

FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInGoogle BookmarksMySpace