Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/971815
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DCValorLengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorTEIXEIRA, A. H. de C.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorSCHERER-WARREN, M.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorHERNANDEZ, F. B. T.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorANDRADE, R. G.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorLEIVAS, J. F.pt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2013-11-21T11:11:11Zpt_BR
dc.date.available2013-11-21T11:11:11Zpt_BR
dc.date.created2013-11-21pt_BR
dc.date.issued2013pt_BR
dc.identifier.citationRemote Sensing, v. 11, n. 3, p. 5783-5804, 2013.pt_BR
dc.identifier.isbn2072-4292pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/971815pt_BR
dc.descriptionIn the Brazilian semi-arid region, the intensification of agriculture results in a change of natural vegetation by irrigated crops. To quantify the contrast between these two ecosystems, the large-scale values of water productivity components were modelled in Petrolina (PE) and Juazeiro (BA) municipalities. The SAFER (Simple Algorithm For Evapotranspiration Retrieving) algorithm was used to acquire evapotranspiration (ET), while the Monteith's radiation model was applied for estimating the biomass production (BIO). Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) satellite images were used together with agro-meteorological data. In Petrolina and Juazeiro, the mean monthly ET values for irrigated crops were 938 and 739 mm·month−1, with the corresponding ones for natural vegetation of 385 and 194 mm·month−1.Water productivity (WP) was analysed by the ratio of BIO to ET, defined here as the ratio of the net benefits from the mixed agricultural systems to the amount of water required for producing those benefits. The highest incremental WP values, as a result of the irrigated crops introduction, happened outside the rainy period. More spatial WP uniformity occurred in natural vegetation, when comparing with irrigated crops. The most frequent WP values in Petrolina were between 1.6 and 2.2 kg·m−3 while in Juazeiro this range was from 1.0 to 1.6 kg·m−3. The differences between the municipalities can be mainly explained by differences in precipitation and soil water storages conditions, promoting better rainfall use efficiency by the natural vegetation in the first one. The results of the current research are important for appraising the land use change impacts in situations of expanding irrigation areas.pt_BR
dc.language.isoporpt_BR
dc.rightsopenAccesspt_BR
dc.subjectNet radiationpt_BR
dc.subjectSurface resistancept_BR
dc.titleLarge-scale water productivity assessments with MODIS images in a changing semi-arid environment: a Brazilian case study.pt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de periódicopt_BR
dc.date.updated2013-11-21T11:11:11Zpt_BR
dc.subject.nalthesaurusEvapotranspirationpt_BR
dc.subject.nalthesaurusBiomass productionpt_BR
riaa.ainfo.id971815pt_BR
riaa.ainfo.lastupdate2013-11-21pt_BR
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/rs5115783pt_BR
dc.contributor.institutionANTONIO HERIBERTO DE C TEIXEIRA, CNPM; MORRIS SCHERER-WARREN, ANA; FERNANDO B. T. HERNANDEZ, UNESP; RICARDO GUIMARAES ANDRADE, CNPM; JANICE FREITAS LEIVAS, CNPM.pt_BR
Aparece en las colecciones:Artigo em periódico indexado (CNPM)

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción TamañoFormato 
remotesensing0505783.pdf1.46 MBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir

FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInGoogle BookmarksMySpace