Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/978882
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCONCEIÇÃO, M. A. F.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorZEOLI, J. de J. S.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorPAULA, M. V. B dept_BR
dc.contributor.otherMARCO ANTONIO FONSECA CONCEICAO, CNPUV; Jéssica de J. S. Zeoli, São Paulo State Technological College; Marcos V. B. de Paula, São Paulo State Technological College.pt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2016-02-23T06:50:35Z-
dc.date.available2016-02-23T06:50:35Z-
dc.date.created2014-02-06pt_BR
dc.date.issued2013pt_BR
dc.identifier.other14865pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/978882pt_BR
dc.descriptionThe seedless table grape cultivar 'BRS Clara' (Vitis vinifera L.) presents yellowish-green berries and was developed for growing in tropical regions. In Brazilian tropical areas irrigation is usually an essential tool. Irrigation cutoff during berry ripening stage is sometimes adopted by grape growers to reduce water application and to increase water use efficiency. This study aimed to evaluate the response of 'BRS Clara' grapevines to irrigation cutoff during ripening stage. The experiment was carried out in Jales, SP, Brazil (20º16'S, 50º33'W, 483m), from June to October 2010, using ?BRS Clara? plants grafted on ?IAC-572? and conducted in a overhead trellis system. The vineyard was irrigated by microsprinklers and covered with polyethylene screen, that is a common practice in the region to protect the grapes against bat and bird attacks. The soil moisture conditions were monitored employing tensiometers installed at 15 cm and 45 cm deep. The experimental design was completely randomized with two treatments, with irrigation (CI) and without irrigation (SI) during fruit ripening. Production and fruit quality variables were evaluated including berry and bunch mass, yield per plant, diameter and length of berries, soluble solids and titratable acidity. There was no difference between treatments for all parameters evaluated. In irrigation treatment (CI) it was applied 41.9 mm during the ripening period, representing 16.1% of total irrigation. The soil water potential in the CI treatment stayed near field capacity, whereas the treatment without irrigation (SI) showed a decrease trend during part of the period, reaching values closed to 70kPa. This reduction did not affect subsequent culture performance. It must be considered, however, that rainfall occurrence was registered since the last week of September and during October, rewetting the soil and approaching the soil water potential values in both treatments.pt_BR
dc.description.uribitstream/item/96584/1/CONCEICAO-GIESCO-2013.pdf; bitstream/item/96591/1/GiESCO-capa-anais-072013.pdfpt_BR
dc.languageenpt_BR
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherCiência e Técnica Vitivinícola, Porto, v. 28, t. 2, p. 167-170, 2013. Número especial.pt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofEmbrapa Uva e Vinho - Artigo em periódico indexado (ALICE)pt_BR
dc.subjectUva de mesapt_BR
dc.subjectBRS Clarapt_BR
dc.subjectSão Paulopt_BR
dc.subjectUvas do Brasil.pt_BR
dc.titleIrrigation cutoff on 'BRS Clara' seedless grapevines during berry ripening stage.pt_BR
dc.typeArtigo em periódico indexado (ALICE)pt_BR
dc.date.updated2018-01-23T11:11:11Zpt_BR
dc.subject.thesagroViticulturapt_BR
dc.subject.thesagroUvapt_BR
dc.subject.thesagroIrrigaçãopt_BR
dc.subject.thesagroEvapotranspiraçãopt_BR
dc.description.notesResumo expandido apresentado no 18º Simpósio Internacional GiESCO, 7 a 11 de julho de 2013, Porto.pt_BR
dc.ainfo.id978882pt_BR
dc.ainfo.lastupdate2018-01-23 -02:00:00pt_BR
Appears in Collections:Artigo em periódico indexado (CNPUV)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
CONCEICAOGIESCO2013.pdf210,79 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
GiESCOcapaanais072013.pdf718,33 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open

FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInGoogle BookmarksMySpace