Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/994920
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorPORRO, R.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorLOPEZ-FELDMAN, A.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorVELA-ALVARADO, J. W.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorQUIÑONEZ-RUÍZ, L.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorSEIJAS-CARDENAS, Z. P.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorVÁSQUEZ-MACEDO, M.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorSALAZAR-ARISTA, C.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorNÚÑEZ-PAREDES, V. I.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorCARDENAS-RUIZ, J.pt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2014-09-15T11:11:11Zpt_BR
dc.date.available2014-09-15T11:11:11Zpt_BR
dc.date.created2014-09-15pt_BR
dc.date.issued2014pt_BR
dc.identifier.citationTropics, v. 23, n. 2, p. 47-62, Sep. 2014.pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/994920pt_BR
dc.descriptionFindings from a survey on sources of income and land allocation outcomes of 578 households from 26 communities with diverse ethnic composition at distinct environmental settings in Ucayali (Peruvian Amazon) are used to contrast livelihood strategies featuring high forest and high agriculture dependency, examining whether agricultural intensification can be linked to lower deforestation. A typology of households based on their land use allocation profile was used to assess current and cumulative cleared land. Recently cleared areas by households oriented to perennials, semi-perennials and pastures were similar to those focusing on annual crops. Multiple class comparisons provided evidence that land use intensification is not associated to land sparing. Near 40% of the households' annual income was derived from forests, followed by agriculture (25%), wages (17%) and livestock (11%). Income structure was used to determine high dependency on forests and on agriculture, featured by respectively 24% and 17% of the households, while 10% relied mostly on wages and/or businesses and half of them had a balanced income structure. Results indicate different expressions of the criticality of forest products, highlighting livelihood strategies based on the integration of income sources. Moreover, the study shows that despite the relevance of forest products, mestizo and indigenous livelihoods heavily depend on agriculture. Policy interventions aimed at environmental conservation and economic development will only be successful when strengthening the integration between agriculture and forest use featured by different social groups in the Amazon.pt_BR
dc.language.isoporpt_BR
dc.rightsopenAccesspt_BR
dc.subjectAmazônia peruanapt_BR
dc.subjectUsopt_BR
dc.subjectPequeno agricultorpt_BR
dc.subjectAgricultura intensivapt_BR
dc.titleForest use and agriculture in Ucayali, Peruvian Amazon: interactions among livelihood strategies, income and environmental outcomes.pt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de periódicopt_BR
dc.date.updated2015-04-01T11:11:11Zpt_BR
dc.subject.thesagroAgriculturapt_BR
dc.subject.thesagroFlorestapt_BR
riaa.ainfo.id994920pt_BR
riaa.ainfo.lastupdate2020-06-03 -03:00:00pt_BR
dc.contributor.institutionROBERTO PORRO, CPATU; Alejandro Lopez-Feldman, Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas, CIDE, Mexico; Jorge W. Vela-Alvarado, Universidad Nacional de Ucayali; Lourdes Quiñonez-Ruíz, Independent researcher; Zully P. Seijas-Cardenas, 6 Gobierno Regional de Ucayali, Gerencia de Recursos Naturales y Gestión del Medio Ambiente; Miguel Vásquez-Macedo, INIA; Clemente Salazar-Arista, INIA; Vladimir I. Núñez-Paredes, IIAP; Jefferson Cardenas-Ruiz, Asociación de Cacaoteros Tecni?cados de Padre Abad, Peru.pt_BR
Aparece nas coleções:Artigo em periódico indexado (CPATU)

Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo Descrição TamanhoFormato 
ForestUseUcayali.pdf613,89 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
Visualizar/Abrir

FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInGoogle BookmarksMySpace