Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1115560
Título: Morphological responses, fruit yield, nutritive value and in vitro gas production of forage watermelon genotypes on semi-arid condition.
Autoria: RIBEIRO, I. A.
VOLTOLINI, T. V.
SIMOES, W. L.
FERREIRA, M. A. J. F.
MENEZES, D. R.
GOIS, G. C.
Afiliação: Isadora Almeida Ribeiro; TADEU VINHAS VOLTOLINI, CPATSA; WELSON LIMA SIMOES, CPATSA; MARIA ALDETE JUSTINIANO DA FONSECA, Cenargen; Daniel Ribeiro Menezes; Glayciane Costa Gois.
Ano de publicação: 2019
Referência: Biological Rhythm Research, v. 50, nov. 2019.
Conteúdo: This study aimed to evaluate morphological, bromatological, in vitro gas production and yield of forage watermelon (Citrullus lanatus var. citroides) genotypes in semi-arid condition. Seven genotypes were evaluated were BGCIA 228, BGCIA 239, Jojoba, BGCIA 228 x BGCIA239, BGCIA 228 x BGCIA Jojoba, BGCIA 239 x Jojoba and BGCIA 991. The experimental design was a complete randomized block with three replicates. The genotypes presented differences between the characteristics: fruit length (P = 0.01), vertical diameter (P = 0.02), peel thickness (P = 0.01), fruit pulp thickness (P = 0.02), transversal diameter (P = 0.02), in vitro dry matter digestibility (P = 0.003) and the latency time (P < 0.0001). Cumulative in vitro gas production and gas production rate was not affected by genotypes. None of the studied genotypes had production and productivity affected. Among them, Jojoba and BGCIA 991 stood out for having heavier and longer fruits, and a higher peel thickness and pulp length.
Thesagro: Planta Forrageira
Genótipo
Forragem
NAL Thesaurus: Citrullus lanatus var. citroides
Forage grasses
Palavras-chave: Melancia forrageira
Semiárido
Digital Object Identifier: 10.1080/09291016.2019.1629218
Tipo do material: Artigo de periódico
Acesso: openAccess
Aparece nas coleções:Artigo em anais de congresso (CPATSA)

Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo Descrição TamanhoFormato 
Morphologicalresponsesfruityieldnutritivevalueandinvitrogasproductionofforage2019.pdf1,41 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
Visualizar/Abrir

FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInGoogle BookmarksMySpace