Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1120347
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorMATUK, F. A.eng
dc.contributor.authorBEHAGEL, J. H.eng
dc.contributor.authorSIMAS, F. N. B.eng
dc.contributor.authorAMARAL, E. F. doeng
dc.contributor.authorHAVERROTH, M.eng
dc.contributor.authorTURNHOUT, E.eng
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-17T18:13:56Z-
dc.date.available2020-02-17T18:13:56Z-
dc.date.created2020-02-17
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationEcosystems and People, v. 16, n. 1, p. 95-113, 2020.eng
dc.identifier.issn2639-5916eng
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1120347-
dc.descriptionThe concepts of 'ecosystem services' (ES) and 'nature's contributions to people' (NCP) inform environmental frameworks that set out to include Indigenous and Local Knowledge systems (ILK) and worldviews in policy and planning processes. These frameworks aim to enhance biodiversity conservation and human well-being in a legitimate and effective way. In this article, we explore how the concept of People's Contributions to Nature (PCN) is complementary to NCP. We use it to investigate challenges that planners and locals face in realizing the legitimate inclusion of diverse knowledges and worldviwes that account for people and ecosystems in a relational way. We introduce a case study where planners drew on ES and NCP and used participatory methods to implement a REDD+ policy in the Kaxinawá Nova Olinda Indigenous Land (Acre-Brazil). We find that both Kaxinawás and planners emphasize both NCP and PCN in their discourses. Nevertheless, differences between knowledge systems and disciplines, uneven power relations between Kaxinawás and planners, and an underconsideration of PCN by global frameworks challenge the legitimate inclusion of the Kaxinawá knowlege and worldviews to craft assessment and planning. We conclude that by explicitly addressing these challenges, science-policy interfaces can further advance knowledge legitimacy and policy effectiveness.eng
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.rightsopenAccesseng
dc.subjectServiços ecossistêmicoseng
dc.subjectServicios ecosistémicoseng
dc.subjectContribuições das pessoas para a naturezaeng
dc.subjectPeople's contributions to nature (PCN)eng
dc.subjectConhecimento tradicionaleng
dc.subjectConocimiento tradicionaleng
dc.subjectAbordagem participativaeng
dc.subjectGestión participativaeng
dc.subjectPovos indígenaseng
dc.subjectPueblos indígenaseng
dc.subjectTerra Indígena Kaxinawá de Nova Olinda (TIKNO)eng
dc.subjectAcreeng
dc.subjectAmazônia Ocidentaleng
dc.subjectWestern Amazoneng
dc.subjectAmazonia Occidentaleng
dc.titleIncluding diverse knowledges and worldviews in environmental assessment and planning: the Brazilian Amazon Kaxinawá Nova Olinda Indigenous Land case.eng
dc.typeArtigo de periódicoeng
dc.date.updated2020-04-20T11:11:11Z
dc.subject.nalthesaurusEcosystem serviceseng
dc.subject.nalthesaurusIndigenous knowledgeeng
dc.subject.nalthesaurusIndigenous peopleseng
dc.subject.nalthesaurusParticipatory managementeng
riaa.ainfo.id1120347eng
riaa.ainfo.lastupdate2020-04-20 -03:00:00
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/26395916.2020.1722752eng
dc.contributor.institutionFernanda Ayaviri Matuk, Wageningen University / Federal Institute of Minas Gerais; Jelle Hendrik Behagel, Wageningen University; Felipe Nogueira Bello Simas, Federal University of Viçosa; EUFRAN FERREIRA DO AMARAL, CPAF-AC; MOACIR HAVERROTH, CPAF-AC; Esther Turnhout, Wageningen University.eng
Aparece nas coleções:Artigo em periódico indexado (CPAF-AC)

Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo Descrição TamanhoFormato 
26972.pdf2,72 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
Visualizar/Abrir
Mostrar registro simples do item Visualizar estatísticas

FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInGoogle BookmarksMySpace