Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1122589
Title: Optimized forest planning: allocation of log storage yards in the Amazonian sustainable forest management area.
Authors: SILVA, E. F. da
SILVA, G. F. da
FIGUEIREDO, E. O.
MENDONÇA, A. R. de
SANTANA, C. J. de O.
FIEDLER, N. C.
SILVA, J. P. M.
AGUIAR, M. O.
SANTOS, J. S.
Affiliation: Evandro Ferreira da Silva, Universidade Federal do Piauí (UFPI); Gilson Fernandes da Silva, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo; EVANDRO ORFANO FIGUEIREDO, CPAF-AC; Adriano Ribeiro de Mendonça, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES); Cesar Junio de Oliveira Santana, Remsoft Solution; Nilton César Fiedler, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES); Jeferson Pereira Martins Silva, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES); Marcelo Otone Aguiar, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES); Jeangelis Silva Santos, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES).
Date Issued: 2020
Citation: Forest Ecology and Management, v. 472, 118231, Sept. 2020.
Description: In Amazonian native forest management, forest road infrastructures, such as log storage yards and skid trails, arethe most expensive attributes and are responsible for the significant environmental impacts with selective treefelling. Road optimization is crucial for reducing environmental impacts and production costs and is stronglylinked to the optimal location of storage yards, which are essential to forest road planning. Considering thepresent problem and the current solutions available, this case study aimed to evaluate the efficiency andeventual gains of optimized forest planning (OFP), as compared to traditional forest planning (TFP). The TFPmethod is currently used most frequently by forest companies in the Amazon region. The study area of 126.41 habelongs to the National Forest (NAFO) Saracá-Taquera, Forest Management Unit II (FMU-II), Annual ProductionUnit (APU) 04/2018, and Work Unit (WU) 2. For the analysis, two areas were defined for exploration: thefirstwas explored using the OFP mathematical model (57.75 ha) and the second followed the TFP plan of thecompany (68.66 ha). Plans and executions for both areas were compared. The OFP model significantly reducedthe Euclidean distances between tree and yards, with only 0.23 km difference in the amount of planned forestroads, when compared to TFP. Additionally, OFP demonstrated a higher productivity (trees.h-1and m3.h-1), areduction of skid distance (by an average of 17.16%), and reduced the cost of log skidding (m3 by 25.76%). Thus,this study proved that OFP is a viable solution that can be adopted by companies to increase productivity.
Thesagro: Administração Florestal
Produtividade
NAL Thesaurus: Sustainable forestry
Economic productivity
Amazonia
Keywords: Manejo florestal sustentável
Terra Santa (PA)
Oriximiná (PA)
FLONA Saracá-Taquera
Pará
Amazônia Oriental
Eastern amazon
ISSN: 0378-1127
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118231
Type of Material: Artigo de periódico
Access: openAccess
Appears in Collections:Artigo em periódico indexado (CPAF-AC)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
26998.pdf2,12 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open

FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInGoogle BookmarksMySpace