Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1150277
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorRUIZ, R. M.
dc.contributor.authorYANO, I. H.
dc.contributor.authorCASTRO, A. de
dc.contributor.authorVASCONCELOS, J. C. S.
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-12T16:25:36Z-
dc.date.available2023-04-12T16:25:36Z-
dc.date.created2022-12-22
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationIn: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 18., 2021, São Paulo. Proceedings and abstracts. São Paulo: FEA/USP, 2021.
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1150277-
dc.descriptionThis work aims to evaluate the storing and retrieving data response time using an Ethereum Smart Contract application to verify the feasibility of its utilization instead of using relational databases in web application development. To achieve the objectives of this work. There was a comparison between the Ethereum Smart Contract and the SQLite, considering response time as the user experience for database choice decisions in future application development. This study consisted of the development of two similar applications. The first one was the Ethereum Smart Contract Application, and the other was the SQLite Application. Using these applications to build graphs of response time behavior as the number of records processed grows. For storing data Blockchain application was much faster than the SQLite application. When retrieving data, the Blockchain application usually starts slower but finishes faster than the SQLite application. Blockchain is a recent technology for secure data storage in a distributed architecture. The hypothesis to be checked was if it also has a good response time compared with other databases. The contribution of this work is to provide information about the efficiency and possible user satisfaction of Blockchain applications.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.subjectBlockchain
dc.subjectDesenvolvimento de aplicações
dc.subjectSegurança
dc.subjectDesempenho
dc.subjectExperiência do usuário
dc.subjectUser experience
dc.subjectSecurity
dc.titleApplication response time comparison between Ethereum smart contract and SQLite database.
dc.typeArtigo em anais e proceedings
dc.subject.thesagroPerformance
dc.description.notesCONTECSI 2021.
riaa.ainfo.id1150277
riaa.ainfo.lastupdate2022-12-22
dc.identifier.doi10.5748/18CONTECSI/COM/ITM/6787
dc.contributor.institutionRENATO MOTA RUIZ, CENTRO UNIVERSITÁRIO; INACIO HENRIQUE YANO, CNPTIA; ALEXANDRE DE CASTRO, CNPTIA; JULIO CEZAR SOUZA VASCONCELOS, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE SÃO CARLOS.
Aparece nas coleções:Artigo em anais de congresso (CNPTIA)

Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo Descrição TamanhoFormato 
PC-Application-response-CONTECSI-2021.pdf719.46 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
Visualizar/Abrir
Mostrar registro simples do item Visualizar estatísticas

FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInGoogle BookmarksMySpace