Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1156016
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorCARNEIRO, F. M.
dc.contributor.authorBRITO FILHO, A. L. de
dc.contributor.authorFERREIRA, F. M.
dc.contributor.authorSEBEN JUNIOR, G. de F.
dc.contributor.authorBRANDÃO, Z. N.
dc.contributor.authorSILVA, R. P. da
dc.contributor.authorSHIRATSUCHI, L. S.
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-21T18:29:35Z-
dc.date.available2023-08-21T18:29:35Z-
dc.date.created2023-08-21
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationSmart Agricultural Technology, v. 5, p. 1-10, 100292, 2023.
dc.identifier.issn2772-3755
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1156016-
dc.descriptionRemote sensing (RS) in agriculture has been widely used for mapping soil, plant, and atmosphere attributes, as well as helping in the sustainable production of the crop by providing the possibility of application at variable rates and estimating the productivity of agricultural crops. In this way, proximal sensors used by RS help producers in decision-making to increase productivity. This research aims to identify the best feature importance ranking to the Random Forest Classifier to predict cotton yield and select which one best correlates with cotton yield. This work was developed in four commercial fields on a Newellton, LA, USA farm. We evaluated the cotton in different years as 2019, 2020, and 2021. The variables evaluated were: soil parameters, topographic indices, elevation derivatives, and orbital remote sensing. The soil sensor used was: GSSI Profiler EMP400 (soil electromagnetic induction sensor) at a frequency of 15 kHz, and the RS data were collected from satellite images from Sentinel 2 (passive sensor) and active sensor from LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging). For training (70%) and validation (30%) of dataset results, Spearman correlation was used between sensors and cotton yield data, machine learning (Random Forest Classifier and Regressor - RFC and RFR). The metric parameters were the coefficient of determination (R2), the Mean Absolute Error (MAE), and the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE). This study found that profiler, Sentinel-2 (blue, red, and green), TPI, LiDAR, and RTK elevation show the best correlations to predicting cotton yield.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.subjectProdução sustentável
dc.subjectSensores proximais
dc.subjectRandom foresteng
dc.subjectSatellite imageryeng
dc.subjectSustainable productioneng
dc.subjectProximal sensorseng
dc.subjectInteligência artificialeng
dc.subjectImagem de satéliteeng
dc.subjectRSeng
dc.subjectDecision treeseng
dc.subjectÁrvores de decisãoeng
dc.titleSoil and satellite remote sensing variables importance using machine learning to predict cotton yield.
dc.typeArtigo de periódico
dc.subject.thesagroAlgodão
dc.subject.thesagroEstrutura do Solo
dc.subject.thesagroSensoriamento Remoto
dc.subject.thesagroGossypium Hirsutumeng
dc.subject.nalthesaurusArtificial intelligenceeng
dc.subject.nalthesaurusCottoneng
dc.subject.nalthesaurusSoil structureeng
dc.subject.nalthesaurusRemote sensingeng
riaa.ainfo.id1156016
riaa.ainfo.lastupdate2023-08-21
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.atech.2023.100292
dc.contributor.institutionFRANCIELE MORLIN CARNEIRO, UTFPR; ARMANDO LOPES DE BRITO FILHO, UNESP; FRANCIELLE MORELLI FERREIRA, UNESP; GETULIO DE FREITAS SEBEN JUNIOR, UNEMAT; ZIANY NEIVA BRANDÃO, CNPA; ROUVERSON PEREIRA DA SILVA, UNESP; LUCIANO SHOZO SHIRATSUCHI, LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY.
Aparece nas coleções:Artigo em periódico indexado (CNPA)

Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo TamanhoFormato 
SOIL-SATELLITE-COTTON-ZIANY.pdf4,6 MBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir
Mostrar registro simples do item Visualizar estatísticas

FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInGoogle BookmarksMySpace