Título:	Deviations in Peer Review Processes: a study of Funding Selection Practices.
Autor:	PINTO, D. M.
Afiliación:	DANIELA MACIEL PINTO, CNPM.
Año:	2024
Referencia:	In: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SCIENCE OF SCIENCE AND INNOVATION, 2024, Washington. Proceedings... Whashington, DC: National Academy of Sciences, 2024.
Páginas:	1 p.
Descripción:	ABSTRACT: Recent discussions regarding more transparent practices of research prioritization, selection, and funding involves, among other aspects, a deeper understanding of traditional procedures for scientific evaluation, known as peer review. In this context, discussions frequently highlight potential limitations of the classic peer review model, which is seen as vulnerable to various forms of interference and inaccuracies that may impact both the selection of research for funding and the determination of publication outcomes (Recio- Saucedo et al., 2022). Despite this acknowledgment, research on peer review is scarce, both when considering this practice in the context of scientific journals (Squazzoni et al., 2020) and funding agencies. One of the main reasons for this gap is the absence of data.
Palabras clave:	Research prioritization
Tipo de Material:	Resumo em anais e proceedings
Acceso:	openAccess
Aparece en las colecciones:	Resumo em anais de congresso (CNPM)